READ

The curious case of conspiracy theories

Can you kill a legend with science?
Dennis Power
Dennis Power
Freelance Writer
The curious case of conspiracy theories

Log entry 51: A shadowy room, a glowing screen, a wall of images with threads tying everything together, forming an ominous red web. 

The suspect is nowhere to be seen, the number of victims: countless.

STICKY THEORIES

Conspiracy theories are insidious things. They seek to explain notable events or a strange set of circumstances without scientific facts.

Whether it’s a hairy creature roaming the woods or chemtrails poisoning the air, at their core, they suggest that powerful entities keep secrets or alter the truth.

But why are conspiracy theories so difficult to disprove? What makes these ideas so pervasive, and persuasive, to some?

Caption: Chemtrails, aka contrails, created by the exhausts of aircraft.
Credit: CC BY-SA 3.0

HOUR 0

Log entry 1: It seemed harmless in the beginning. An idea, nothing more. And yet, as it gained momentum, it became increasingly ‘true’. 

The idea became ‘unfalsifiable’ – not capable of being proved false.

Then it took on a life of its own.

THE VICTIMS

Log entry 23: The victims appeared random at first. The popular narrative is that they were ‘simple-minded’ but there’s no clear link between intelligence and susceptibility. Digging a little deeper, patterns begin to emerge.

Those susceptible to believing conspiracy theories have a tendency to perceive threat and danger. While some have ‘odd’ beliefs and experiences, others rely too heavily on their intuition, then there are the antagonists who believe they’re superior to others.

All have a desire for certainty.

It also seems certain environmental conditions lead to increased acceptance of ‘alternative facts’ – a wider perception of inequality and corruption.

In times of uncertainty and upheaval, distrust in the powers that be becomes the perfect hunting ground for conspiracies – politicians lie, scientists are ‘in on it’ and institutions are just looking to profit.

THE CALLING CARD

Log entry 39: These new cases are familiar, executed in that same telltale way.

Conspiracy theories often follow the same formula.

There are the conspirators – usually a group in a position of power – who manipulate the narrative to keep a secret from the masses. 

A ‘pattern’ is established by drawing connections between unrelated things to provide ‘meaningful evidence’, like how birds move in jerky movements proves that the government replaced them with drones to surveil us.

Finally, the good versus evil paradigm is put into play. This creates a struggle for truth seekers to fight against while pointing the finger at an unsuspecting scapegoat.

STAYING SAFE

Log entry 42: Finally, some progress. A witness has come forward to share their insights.

There are ways to prevent falling victim to conspiracy theories, or if you already have, it’s possible to change beliefs.

Awareness and critical thinking are the most effective defences.

Conspiracy theories are often presented in a sensationalised or strongly emotional way. They might be filled with ‘facts’ that explain everything, but these should be verified and tested.

Identifying where a conspiracy theory came from can help identify possible motives for the deception.

Remember, reliable sources are always transparent.

IMMORTAL IDEAS

The scalpel of science can be used to slice through the ‘alternative facts’, but because of their unfalsifiable nature, this often isn’t enough to silence them.

Log entry 52: The elusive beast got away, it’s Operation Deepscan all over again. Sonar equipment was used to scan the entirety of Loch Ness in search of Nessie, but despite the evidence that no such creature exists, the myth lives on.

Caption: The infamous “surgeon’s photo” of Nessie, later proven to be fake.
Credit: PDM 1.0

And so it goes for many other cases. Mathematics confirming the Earth is a sphere, lunar samples proving mankind dropped by, rigorous science separating autism from vaccines – they’re all denied.

Log entry 66: Alas, another cold case. Another dossier closed unsatisfactorily and placed among its brethren, the abominable snowman, 911 and lizard people.

They’re still out there, manipulating the masses, causing harm, proffering false promises but maybe, just maybe, some of them are true.

Dennis Power
About the author
Dennis Power
They say that curiosity killed the cat, but Dennis knows satisfaction brought it back. Obsessed with asking questions, getting answers, and learning new facts to share with anyone who will listen, science journalism was his logical destination. Dennis loves synthetic chemistry and is a regular contributor to the Chemistry in Australia magazine. He is also the science editor for The Metamorphosis Project Journal. After four years of his PhD he decided he’d rather not handle nasty chemicals every day and built a tiny house on wheels instead.
View articles
They say that curiosity killed the cat, but Dennis knows satisfaction brought it back. Obsessed with asking questions, getting answers, and learning new facts to share with anyone who will listen, science journalism was his logical destination. Dennis loves synthetic chemistry and is a regular contributor to the Chemistry in Australia magazine. He is also the science editor for The Metamorphosis Project Journal. After four years of his PhD he decided he’d rather not handle nasty chemicals every day and built a tiny house on wheels instead.
View articles

NEXT ARTICLE

We've got chemistry, let's take it to the next level!

Get the latest WA science news delivered to your inbox, every fortnight.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Republish

Creative Commons Logo

Republishing our content

We want our stories to be shared and seen by as many people as possible.

Therefore, unless it says otherwise, copyright on the stories on Particle belongs to Scitech and they are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This allows you to republish our articles online or in print for free. You just need to credit us and link to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately.

Using the ‘republish’ button on our website is the easiest way to meet our guidelines.

Guidelines

You cannot edit the article.

When republishing, you have to credit our authors, ideally in the byline. You have to credit Particle with a link back to the original publication on Particle.

If you’re republishing online, you must use our pageview counter, link to us and include links from our story. Our page view counter is a small pixel-ping (invisible to the eye) that allows us to know when our content is republished. It’s a condition of our guidelines that you include our counter. If you use the ‘republish’ then you’ll capture our page counter.

If you’re republishing in print, please email us to let us so we know about it (we get very proud to see our work republished) and you must include the Particle logo next to the credits. Download logo here.

If you wish to republish all our stories, please contact us directly to discuss this opportunity.

Images

Most of the images used on Particle are copyright of the photographer who made them.

It is your responsibility to confirm that you’re licensed to republish images in our articles.

Video

All Particle videos can be accessed through YouTube under the Standard YouTube Licence.

The Standard YouTube licence

  1. This licence is ‘All Rights Reserved’, granting provisions for YouTube to display the content, and YouTube’s visitors to stream the content. This means that the content may be streamed from YouTube but specifically forbids downloading, adaptation, and redistribution, except where otherwise licensed. When uploading your content to YouTube it will automatically use the Standard YouTube licence. You can check this by clicking on Advanced Settings and looking at the dropdown box ‘License and rights ownership’.
  2. When a user is uploading a video he has license options that he can choose from. The first option is “standard YouTube License” which means that you grant the broadcasting rights to YouTube. This essentially means that your video can only be accessed from YouTube for watching purpose and cannot be reproduced or distributed in any other form without your consent.

Contact

For more information about using our content, email us: particle@scitech.org.au

Copy this HTML into your CMS
Press Ctrl+C to copy