READ

Smoke (and vapes) and Mirrors

Why do anti-smoking and anti-vaping campaigns look so different?
Kaitlin Britto
Kaitlin Britto
Freelance Writer
Smoke (and vapes) and Mirrors

Smokers are confronted with disfigured body parts on their cigarette packets. 

But vapers? They get a lesson in chemistry.  

Australian public health campaigns have changed over the years, even when tackling the same issue: nicotine. 

While anti-smoking campaigns use fear and social factors to try to reduce smoking rates, anti-vaping campaigns focus on individual physical health.

But why?

SMOKING, MEET FEAR

Beginning in the 1960s, anti-smoking campaigns have leaned on fear-based motivators like death and disease, and social shame. Similar motivators have been used recently too.

Cancer Council WA’s Make Smoking History campaign showed the surgical removal of a smoker’s voice box as a result of throat cancer in 2019.

In 2022, the Worried About You campaign encouraged smokers to quit for their family.

By 2026, the Beat the Cravings campaign, run by the Cancer Institute NSW, has a softer tone and provides simple and actionable steps to quit smoking tobacco.

These campaigns are targeted at adults for good reason.

According to Australia’s peak cancer authority Cancer Council Australia, anti-smoking education campaigns that target teenagers are largely ineffective.

Reducing adult smoking rates is what actually prevents smoking uptake in teenagers.

VAPE, MEET CHEMISTRY

The introduction of electronic nicotine delivery systems, more commonly known as e-cigarettes or vapes, shifted the demographics of advertising with anti-vaping campaign videos for 14 to 24-year-olds as brief as 6 seconds.

The main message of the recent NSW Government Every Vape is a Hit to Your Health campaign was that the vapour produced by vapes is full of harmful chemicals like formaldehyde, arsenic and chlorine.

These campaign videos feature testimonials from young vapers who struggle to walk up the stairs.

Caption: Every Vape is a Hit to Your Health anti-vaping campaign posters. 
Credit: Cancer Institute NSW

A 2025 analysis found only 6% of anti-vaping campaigns framed the social consequences of nicotine use compared to 26% of tobacco cessation campaigns. 

Does this mean young people don’t think vaping has social consequences?   

Michelle Lampis, a Student Drug and Alcohol Counsellor at a New South Wales university, says the lack of social stigma has been a problem – but perhaps not for much longer.  

“I think it’s changing,” says Michelle. “[Vaping is] the thing that people are doing, and that’s very powerful … but we are seeing a downturn.”

A 2025 Australian survey reports that vape use is becoming increasingly stigmatised. 

Young Australians are starting to feel shame and embarrassment surrounding their use, realising it is unhealthy. 

A NOT-SO-SAFE ALTERNATIVE

A University of Queensland study of 24 Australian vaping education campaigns between 2021 and 2025 found more than half of the campaigns depicted vapes as equally or more harmful or addictive than cigarettes.

These researchers might be onto something.

“What we have found with a lot of the illegal black market vapes is that the amount of chemicals and the amount of nicotine in these vapes outweighs any combustible cigarette, which is heavily regulated,” says Michelle.

“You’re generally having, sometimes, 10 times more nicotine in a vape.”

With vaping rates among teens thought to be declining, will this just encourage them to smoke cigarettes instead? 

According to a 2025 study, the decline of adolescent smoking has slowed since the introduction of vapes.

Caption: Do You Know What You’re Vaping? Department of Health anti-vaping campaign material. 
Credit: WA Department of Health

UP IN SMOKE

So are these campaigns working?

Daily smoking among Australians has dropped from 19.5% in 2001 to 5.6% in 2025, according to the 2025 National Drug Strategy Household Survey.

A 2026 evaluation of the Every Vape is a Hit to Your Health campaign found young Australian vapers who recognised the campaign were almost twice as likely to have made a quit attempt and more than twice as likely to have cut down their use compared to those who hadn’t seen it.  

“I would say young people are very responsive to marketing,” says Michelle.

“What we have noticed is since there has been a campaign to inform people of the health effects and the dangers of vaping, there has been a downturn in use.”

Maybe a chemistry lesson does teach us something after all.

Kaitlin Britto
About the author
Kaitlin Britto
Kaitlin is a freelance science writer, with a background in Anatomy and Human Biology. She loves reading, lifting heavier weights than boys at the gym, and giving out advice (while failing to take her own).
View articles
Kaitlin is a freelance science writer, with a background in Anatomy and Human Biology. She loves reading, lifting heavier weights than boys at the gym, and giving out advice (while failing to take her own).
View articles

NEXT ARTICLE

We've got chemistry, let's take it to the next level!

Get the latest WA science news delivered to your inbox, every fortnight.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Republish

Creative Commons Logo

Republishing our content

We want our stories to be shared and seen by as many people as possible.

Therefore, unless it says otherwise, copyright on the stories on Particle belongs to Scitech and they are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This allows you to republish our articles online or in print for free. You just need to credit us and link to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately.

Using the ‘republish’ button on our website is the easiest way to meet our guidelines.

Guidelines

You cannot edit the article.

When republishing, you have to credit our authors, ideally in the byline. You have to credit Particle with a link back to the original publication on Particle.

If you’re republishing online, you must use our pageview counter, link to us and include links from our story. Our page view counter is a small pixel-ping (invisible to the eye) that allows us to know when our content is republished. It’s a condition of our guidelines that you include our counter. If you use the ‘republish’ then you’ll capture our page counter.

If you’re republishing in print, please email us to let us so we know about it (we get very proud to see our work republished) and you must include the Particle logo next to the credits. Download logo here.

If you wish to republish all our stories, please contact us directly to discuss this opportunity.

Images

Most of the images used on Particle are copyright of the photographer who made them.

It is your responsibility to confirm that you’re licensed to republish images in our articles.

Video

All Particle videos can be accessed through YouTube under the Standard YouTube Licence.

The Standard YouTube licence

  1. This licence is ‘All Rights Reserved’, granting provisions for YouTube to display the content, and YouTube’s visitors to stream the content. This means that the content may be streamed from YouTube but specifically forbids downloading, adaptation, and redistribution, except where otherwise licensed. When uploading your content to YouTube it will automatically use the Standard YouTube licence. You can check this by clicking on Advanced Settings and looking at the dropdown box ‘License and rights ownership’.
  2. When a user is uploading a video he has license options that he can choose from. The first option is “standard YouTube License” which means that you grant the broadcasting rights to YouTube. This essentially means that your video can only be accessed from YouTube for watching purpose and cannot be reproduced or distributed in any other form without your consent.

Contact

For more information about using our content, email us: particle@scitech.org.au

Copy this HTML into your CMS
Press Ctrl+C to copy