Get Regular Updates!




Whatever happened to Y2K?

Whatever happened to Y2K?

Twenty years ago we thought the world was going to end, all thanks to a little thing called Y2K.

Whatever happened to Y2K?

In the 1990s we weren’t worried about the end of the world as we knew it due to climate change or terrorism.

No, we were worried about the world ending as the clock ticked over from 1999 to 2000. The threat was a potential calendar glitch called the Y2K bug or the Year 2000 problem.

So what was it? Basically, the prospect of a few missing digits in a lot of old computers caused an end of the millennium panic.

View Larger
Computers in the 1990s: boxy and ready for a floppy disk

Social media meltdown

Too young to remember Y2K? Dr. Richard Forno, Director of the UMBC Graduate Cybersecurity Program in the United States, has a modern day scenario for you.

“Imagine a world where nearly everyone thought Facebook, Twitter, Snap, Insta, TikTok, Google, Postmates, Deliveroo, Uber… wireless networks, power grids, … pretty much all aspects of modern life …. were predicted to all go down at the same time,” Richard says.

Insert face screaming in fear emoji here, right?

OMG it’s Y2K

While computers today (and even 20 years ago) have lots of storage space, that wasn’t the case back in the 1960s.

Back then, space was so limited that early programmers took a shortcut to save space when making them.

While it may sound ridiculous today, they used a date format where the year was only two digits – such as 99 – instead of four – such as 1999. Yes, those two extra digits actually took up a relatively large amount of space on those ancient computers.

The problem was that no-one thought the computers and programs would still be in use 40 years later when 2000 rolled around.

View Larger
Image|The Twilight Zone, ‘From Agnes with Love’ (1964)
Computers in the 1960s: ticker tape was mandatory!

Richard, who completed his PhD at Curtin University’s Internet Studies Program, says “the world was based, if not dependent, on all these systems. Nobody really thought about the ‘bad side’ of networking everything together.”

The legacy of legacy systems

Many of these legacy systems were hard to update. And no one really knew what would happen if they weren’t updated, Richard says.

“The fear was that when the internal computer clocks rolled over from 23.59 to 00.00 on 1/1/2000, these systems would encounter flat-out crashes or errors that would lead them to crash and disrupt things, ranging from power and water distribution to satellites and more,” he says.

Obviously, the world didn’t end.

View Larger
Sure, not the most reputable newspaper source but the panic was real!

While there were a few glitches, the world’s organisations and governments addressed the problem in time.

The next Y2K?

In 2019, cybersecurity experts are worried about bigger problems than two missing digits.

While there are many threats and vulnerabilities today to be concerned about, Richard says he’s particularly concerned about the nature of truth and what’s ‘real’.

“Threats to the integrity of data, information, and knowledge scare the living —- out of me,” Richard says.

“Things like unbounded AI (artificial intelligence) or ML (machine learning), enabled or generated deep fakes are a growing huge problem.”

This refers to the ability to make fake videos of real people.

Video|Collider Videos
Deepfake technology brings together five living legends to discuss the streaming wars and the future of cinema.

Richard says another concern is how many people simply believe what’s presented to them is fact.

“To me [that] represents an existential threat to society and the world at large,” he says.

There’s also the 2038 problem, but that’s still 18 years away so no one’s really worried about that yet. Happy new year!

Particle Puns


Creative Commons Logo

Republishing our content

We want our stories to be shared and seen by as many people as possible.

Therefore, unless it says otherwise, copyright on the stories on Particle belongs to Scitech and they are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This allows you to republish our articles online or in print for free. You just need to credit us and link to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately.

Using the ‘republish’ button on our website is the easiest way to meet our guidelines.


You cannot edit the article.

When republishing, you have to credit our authors, ideally in the byline. You have to credit Particle with a link back to the original publication on Particle.

If you’re republishing online, you must use our pageview counter, link to us and include links from our story. Our page view counter is a small pixel-ping (invisible to the eye) that allows us to know when our content is republished. It’s a condition of our guidelines that you include our counter. If you use the ‘republish’ then you’ll capture our page counter.

If you’re republishing in print, please email us to let us so we know about it (we get very proud to see our work republished) and you must include the Particle logo next to the credits. Download logo here.

If you wish to republish all our stories, please contact us directly to discuss this opportunity.


Most of the images used on Particle are copyright of the photographer who made them.

It is your responsibility to confirm that you’re licensed to republish images in our articles.


All Particle videos can be accessed through YouTube under the Standard YouTube Licence.

The Standard YouTube licence

  1. This licence is ‘All Rights Reserved’, granting provisions for YouTube to display the content, and YouTube’s visitors to stream the content. This means that the content may be streamed from YouTube but specifically forbids downloading, adaptation, and redistribution, except where otherwise licensed. When uploading your content to YouTube it will automatically use the Standard YouTube licence. You can check this by clicking on Advanced Settings and looking at the dropdown box ‘License and rights ownership’.
  2. When a user is uploading a video he has license options that he can choose from. The first option is “standard YouTube License” which means that you grant the broadcasting rights to YouTube. This essentially means that your video can only be accessed from YouTube for watching purpose and cannot be reproduced or distributed in any other form without your consent.


For more information about using our content, email us:

Copy this HTML into your CMS
Press Ctrl+C to copy

We've got chemistry. Want something physical?