READ

Human constellations are hiding space

The future of astronomy hinges on one seemingly obvious question: what colour is the night sky?
Thomas Crow
Thomas Crow
Freelance science writer
Human constellations are hiding space

Our ability to do astronomy hinges on one seemingly obvious question: what colour is the night sky?

Travel from the city to the country, and you’ll see the sky’s palette shift from the harsh orange to the country’s whorls of blue and purple.

Invisible to us, there is another shift from city to country. Radio waves give us the internet, the ability to communicate and the rest of the modern world.

As buildings are replaced by trees, radio towers become further apart and radio waves grow weak.

But as the night sky is getting busier, even these dark places are under threat from above.

Our universe keeps on expanding and expanding

Astronomers observe the universe using telescopes that catch light and radio waves.

Most places in the universe are too distant for us to travel to. Instead, light and radio waves let us observe the 70 billion trillion stars (a 7 with 22 zeroes after it) in the observable universe.

Light and radio pollution from the modern world can drown out these signals.

Astronomer and science communicator Fred Watson knows the problems a busy night sky can bring.

“In the next decade, we’ll see 90,000 more satellites in the sky. That does not mean the end for ground-based astronomy, but it certainly presents problems,” says Fred.

Starkink satellites trails on the night sky as seen from Cordoba, Argentina on Mat 6th, 2020.
View Larger

Starlink satellites trails on the night sky as seen in May 2020.

Image credit: Getty / Roberto Michel
Starlink satellites trails on the night sky as seen in May 2020.

New satellites can pollute our night skies. They reflect light from the Sun at night, and their messages to Earth are in radio signals.

A Starlink satellite is 10 trillion times brighter than most other things in our skies. SpaceX plans to launch over 40,000.

Other companies, like Amazon and OneWeb, have similar plans.

The impact of these satellites on observatories will be huge.

As fast as it can go, at the speed of light you know

Widefield telescopes, telescopes that view large sections of the sky, are especially vulnerable to this pollution.

The Vera C Rubin observatory in Chile is predicted to have 50% of its images affected by satellites.

A simulation of 47,708 satellites paths as they orbit around the Earth
View Larger

A simulation of 47,708 satellites’ paths as they orbit around the Earth

A simulation of 47,708 satellites’ paths as they orbit around the Earth

WA’s Murchison Widefield Array is even larger and will have to deal with more pollution in radio waves.

“Observatories [operating in the radio range of 50–350MHz] will need to increase their observation times by 70% to counteract the effect of the Starlink satellites,” says Fred.

So what can we do?

Windows of Opportunity

Nobody wants to lose Earth-bound observatories.

They have helped us discover 4000 planets beyond our Solar System and watch black holes merge.

Graph: The longer a telescope operates, the more likely it is to be affected by satellite pollution.
View Larger

The longer a telescope operates, the more likely it is to be affected by satellite pollution.

Image credit: Galadi
The longer a telescope operates, the more likely it is to be affected by satellite pollution.

But we also need communications satellites.

The United States’ NOIRLab is part of the National Science Foundation. They say observatories can build new software to erase satellites from observatory data.

Companies can help by pointing satellites 20 degrees away from observatories as they pass over.

“There has to be compromise on both sides. Companies and astronomers can agree on observation windows,” says Fred.

But what will happen if we keep sending thousands of satellites into orbit?

Looking at the dark side of the Moon

One solution, as our skies get more crowded, is to build observatories on the dark side of the Moon, but this poses its own problems.

“The problem with the Moon is it gets 14 days of daylight, then darkness. You could build observatories, but they would be more difficult than on Earth. They would also be more expensive, but spaceflight is getting cheaper.”

SpaceX claim they can fix the problem by changing the orientation of the satellites as they pass over observatories.
View Larger

SpaceX claim they can fix the problem by changing the orientation of the satellites as they pass over observatories.

Image credit: SpaceX
SpaceX claim they can fix the problem by changing the orientation of the satellites as they pass over observatories.

NASA is planning to build a Moon base by 2050. Other space agencies are looking at moving to the Moon as well. These missions could help lay the foundations for Moon observatories by 2100.

The future might be filled with shining satellites instead of stars. But for now, businesses and astronomers need to work together so we can keep discovering our universe.

Thomas Crow
About the author
Thomas Crow
Thomas Crow is an Australian science writer. He has a background in professional writing, biochemistry and genetics. He writes for Australian and New Zealand research institutes and publications like Crikey. He's a horror and gothic fantasy fan. He thinks of himself as a gardener but scores of dead plants beg to differ.
View articles
Thomas Crow is an Australian science writer. He has a background in professional writing, biochemistry and genetics. He writes for Australian and New Zealand research institutes and publications like Crikey. He's a horror and gothic fantasy fan. He thinks of himself as a gardener but scores of dead plants beg to differ.
View articles

NEXT ARTICLE

We've got chemistry, let's take it to the next level!

Get the latest WA science news delivered to your inbox, every fortnight.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Republish

Creative Commons Logo

Republishing our content

We want our stories to be shared and seen by as many people as possible.

Therefore, unless it says otherwise, copyright on the stories on Particle belongs to Scitech and they are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This allows you to republish our articles online or in print for free. You just need to credit us and link to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately.

Using the ‘republish’ button on our website is the easiest way to meet our guidelines.

Guidelines

You cannot edit the article.

When republishing, you have to credit our authors, ideally in the byline. You have to credit Particle with a link back to the original publication on Particle.

If you’re republishing online, you must use our pageview counter, link to us and include links from our story. Our page view counter is a small pixel-ping (invisible to the eye) that allows us to know when our content is republished. It’s a condition of our guidelines that you include our counter. If you use the ‘republish’ then you’ll capture our page counter.

If you’re republishing in print, please email us to let us so we know about it (we get very proud to see our work republished) and you must include the Particle logo next to the credits. Download logo here.

If you wish to republish all our stories, please contact us directly to discuss this opportunity.

Images

Most of the images used on Particle are copyright of the photographer who made them.

It is your responsibility to confirm that you’re licensed to republish images in our articles.

Video

All Particle videos can be accessed through YouTube under the Standard YouTube Licence.

The Standard YouTube licence

  1. This licence is ‘All Rights Reserved’, granting provisions for YouTube to display the content, and YouTube’s visitors to stream the content. This means that the content may be streamed from YouTube but specifically forbids downloading, adaptation, and redistribution, except where otherwise licensed. When uploading your content to YouTube it will automatically use the Standard YouTube licence. You can check this by clicking on Advanced Settings and looking at the dropdown box ‘License and rights ownership’.
  2. When a user is uploading a video he has license options that he can choose from. The first option is “standard YouTube License” which means that you grant the broadcasting rights to YouTube. This essentially means that your video can only be accessed from YouTube for watching purpose and cannot be reproduced or distributed in any other form without your consent.

Contact

For more information about using our content, email us: particle@scitech.org.au

Copy this HTML into your CMS
Press Ctrl+C to copy