Shorebird breakfasts come with a side of plastic

Researchers have made some crappy findings in the guano of coastal bird species.
Kerri Duncan
Kerri Duncan
Freelance Writer
Shorebird breakfasts come with a side of plastic
Image credit: Joshua J. Cotten via Unsplash

Who ordered the large side of plastic?

Not Australia’s shorebirds. Unfortunately, that’s exactly what’s on the menu at our beaches. And it’s ending up in the excrement (also known as guano) of some of our most vulnerable species.

A study in Tasmania has found that the amount of plastic in different birds’ guano might boil down to their prey choices and foraging strategies.


When plastic breaks down (which can take hundreds of years), it doesn’t disappear. Instead, it fragments into microplastics and nanoplastics. These tiny pieces can be detected in a laboratory using flow cytometry or infrared spectroscopy.

Coastlines are particular magnets for plastic. Pollution from both the land and the ocean makes its way into estuaries and beaches and settles in the sand. Currently, an estimated 14 million tons of plastic enter the ocean every year.


“About 99% of the plastic I see in shorebird habitats is washing up from the ocean,” says Deborah Furbank, a coastal wildlife project coordinator at BirdLife Australia.

The washed up plastic fragments can be consumed by crustaceans, bivalves, molluscs and worms, which can then be eaten by our shorebirds.


The Tasmanian study focused on hooded plovers (hoodies) and pied oystercatchers (POCs) – two species also found here in WA. BirdLife categorises hoodies as ‘vulnerable’ and POCs as a species of ‘least concern’.

These birds have very different feeding strategies.

Juvenile hooded plovers foraging in the shallows | Mary James

While POCs and hoodies share a similar environment, hoodies are visual feeders that forage in shallower depths of sand. In contrast, POCs probe their long bills deeper into the sand.

“Prey is detected with sensory systems in the beaks,” says John Cobb, a volunteer coordinator at BirdLife.

The study found that, despite foraging in the same area of the coastline – which had plastic present in 100% of sediment samples – the vulnerable hoodies had 32 times more plastic in their guano than the POCs.

The quantity of plastic in sediment samples did not seem to significantly affect the amount that ended up in bird guano. The researchers concluded that the birds’ eating habits and prey preferences might play a major role in how much plastic gets consumed.

Pied oystercatcher with its prey | Mary James


So why is eating plastic a big deal if it eventually comes out the other end?

The main concern is that some plastic isn’t coming out the other end. Depending on its size, plastic can become bioavailable.

This means it’s absorbed into the body and can penetrate biological membranes.

While we’re still trying to figure out exactly what this means for the birds, there’s growing evidence that it’s not good for them.

Plastic can transport or leach toxic additives and accumulate to obstruct digestive systems.

In species lower in the food chain, including those eaten by shorebirds, we’ve seen negative effects on things like growth rates, cell viability and reproductive rates.



If it’s bad for their food source, it’s almost certainly bad for the birds themselves. Shorebirds consume plastic both directly from the sand and from their prey. And whatever animal eats the shorebirds will inevitably end up consuming plastic as well.

Some scientists think this pattern might be a contributing factor to recent wildlife population declines. But it’s still a poorly understood area that needs more solid evidence.

In the meantime, for vulnerable species like hoodies, plastic pollution is just another unwelcome hurdle in the race for survival. For years, they’ve already been struggling against habitat disturbance, invasive species and climate change.

According to Deborah, hoodies are constantly disturbed on many of our beaches.

“Particularly [by] off-leash dogs. Vehicles can have a big impact when they have access to beaches and dunes. Crushing isn’t the only impact. Every time the adults are disturbed from breeding, their eggs and chicks are left vulnerable to predators and weather conditions,” says Deborah.

Further understanding the threats of plastic ingestion, while continuing to reduce plastic use in the first place, is vital for developing a successful conservation plan.

In the meantime, a chick’s still gotta eat.

Kerri Duncan
About the author
Kerri Duncan
Kerri is an Adelaide-based freelance writer with a background in animal science and molecular biology. Always up for an investigative adventure, Kerri is addicted to exploring Earth's wonders and finding as many waterfalls as possible. Her work in life sciences has deepened her appreciation of the natural world and she feels compelled to write about it.
View articles
Kerri is an Adelaide-based freelance writer with a background in animal science and molecular biology. Always up for an investigative adventure, Kerri is addicted to exploring Earth's wonders and finding as many waterfalls as possible. Her work in life sciences has deepened her appreciation of the natural world and she feels compelled to write about it.
View articles


We've got chemistry, let's take it to the next level!

Get the latest WA science news delivered to your inbox, every fortnight.


Creative Commons Logo

Republishing our content

We want our stories to be shared and seen by as many people as possible.

Therefore, unless it says otherwise, copyright on the stories on Particle belongs to Scitech and they are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This allows you to republish our articles online or in print for free. You just need to credit us and link to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately.

Using the ‘republish’ button on our website is the easiest way to meet our guidelines.


You cannot edit the article.

When republishing, you have to credit our authors, ideally in the byline. You have to credit Particle with a link back to the original publication on Particle.

If you’re republishing online, you must use our pageview counter, link to us and include links from our story. Our page view counter is a small pixel-ping (invisible to the eye) that allows us to know when our content is republished. It’s a condition of our guidelines that you include our counter. If you use the ‘republish’ then you’ll capture our page counter.

If you’re republishing in print, please email us to let us so we know about it (we get very proud to see our work republished) and you must include the Particle logo next to the credits. Download logo here.

If you wish to republish all our stories, please contact us directly to discuss this opportunity.


Most of the images used on Particle are copyright of the photographer who made them.

It is your responsibility to confirm that you’re licensed to republish images in our articles.


All Particle videos can be accessed through YouTube under the Standard YouTube Licence.

The Standard YouTube licence

  1. This licence is ‘All Rights Reserved’, granting provisions for YouTube to display the content, and YouTube’s visitors to stream the content. This means that the content may be streamed from YouTube but specifically forbids downloading, adaptation, and redistribution, except where otherwise licensed. When uploading your content to YouTube it will automatically use the Standard YouTube licence. You can check this by clicking on Advanced Settings and looking at the dropdown box ‘License and rights ownership’.
  2. When a user is uploading a video he has license options that he can choose from. The first option is “standard YouTube License” which means that you grant the broadcasting rights to YouTube. This essentially means that your video can only be accessed from YouTube for watching purpose and cannot be reproduced or distributed in any other form without your consent.


For more information about using our content, email us:

Copy this HTML into your CMS
Press Ctrl+C to copy