READ

Keeping up with the times: Australia’s fire danger rating system overhaul

With our environment rapidly changing, it was only a matter of time before our bushfire categorisation changed as well.
Kyle Pauletto
Kyle Pauletto
Freelance Journalist
Keeping up with the times: Australia’s fire danger rating system overhaul
Image credit: Department of Fire and Emergency Services

In 2022, Australia took a bold step to revolutionise its approach to bushfire threats.

As the severity and frequency of bushfires ramped up, emergency departments across the country agreed that our fire danger rating system was desperately due for an update. It was almost 60 years old after all.

This wasn’t just a minor adjustment but a full-scale transformation, bringing the country’s warning system into the era of advanced weather technology and heightened environmental change.

Introducing, the Australian Fire Danger Rating System (AFDRS).

THE CATALYST FOR CHANGE

It’s a common misconception that the fire danger rating system shows the likelihood of a bushfire occurring. Instead, it’s actually providing guidance on the potential severity and behaviour of bushfires, focusing on how challenging a fire might be to manage rather than the likelihood of one starting.

Each rating level informs residents about the expected conditions of a fire if one were to occur, emphasising the intensity, speed and difficulty of containment. It’s there to help communities make informed decisions during or in the lead-up to a bushfire.

The previous fire danger rating system, the McArthur Forest Fire Danger Index (FFDI), was introduced by CSIRO scientist Alan Grant McArthur in 1967. It employed five levels to communicate bushfire risks: low-moderate, high, very high, severe and extreme.

In the decades following its introduction, the FFDI became fragmented as individual states attempted to modernise the system.

Then, following the 2009 Black Saturday bushfires that took the lives of 173 Victorians, the ‘catastrophic’ category was added and a Royal Commission was held.

The 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission resulted in 67 recommendations. The first recommendation was that the role of warnings be enhanced to better advise bushfire-prone communities on how to act should disaster strike.

This was just one of the driving forces behind the AFDRS.

STREAMLINE AND SIMPLIFY

Murray Carter is the Executive Director of the Rural Fire Division at the Western Australian Department of Fire and Emergency Services (DFES).

According to Murray, the previous system was outdated, overly complicated and obsolete.

“We were operating on a 60-year-old system,” says Murray.

“Social research [in recent years] nationally showed that, whilst it had been in place for a long time, the old system wasn’t well understood by the community.”

Research also shows that, even when a community understands bushfire warnings, it doesn’t guarantee that its members will respond as advised.

The AFDRS categories – moderate, high, extreme and catastrophic – are action oriented. It offers a more streamlined, user-friendly approach.

View Larger

Side by side comparison of the new AFDRS categories (right) and the old FFDI categories.

Image credit: Department of Fire and Emergency Services
Side by side comparison of the new AFDRS categories (right) and the old FFDI categories.

The new system enhances forecast reliability by using advanced science on weather, fuel and fire behaviour across diverse vegetation types, enabling emergency services to determine more precise and relevant threat levels.

The end goal is to reduce the loss of life, property and human harm by creating communities that are well informed and better prepared for possible bushfires.

A FOCUS ON DATA DIVERSITY

One element of the upgrades particularly pertinent to Western Australians is the newly diversified vegetation classifications.

Previously, Australia was divided into just two vegetation types: forest and grassland. These classifications were used to inform emergency services on how best to approach a bushfire threat.

Of course, our vast country is more diverse than just forests and grasslands. The AFDRS is designed to include six additional vegetation types: grassy woodland, spinifex, shrubland, mallee heath, button grass and pine.

In WA, we have seven of the eight vegetation types specified in the AFDRS.

Murray Carter, the Executive Director of the Rural Fire Division at the Western Australian Department of Fire and Emergency Services

Image credit: Department of Fire and Emergency Services
Murray Carter, the Executive Director of the Rural Fire Division at the Western Australian Department of Fire and Emergency Services
“The way fire behaves in spinifex, of course, is very different to the way it behaves in a jarrah forest or karri forest,” says Murray.

Murray says combining the diversified vegetation classification with improved meteorological data significantly boosts the system’s capabilities.

“That’s one of the huge improvements … which is terrific for the sector in terms of using it for our daily, weekly, monthly and seasonal preparedness for bushfires.”

BUMPS ALONG THE WAY

Of course, as with any significant change, the transition to AFDRS wasn’t all smooth sailing.

Following its rollout in Queensland, concern was raised by communities and industry experts when a ‘catastrophic’ fire warning was incorrectly issued for a large area of southern Queensland.

The AFDRS’ ‘catastrophic’ warning calls for immediate evacuation and warns of a high probability of casualties. It was live for 16 hours before being corrected.

There were problems closer to home as well.

“A few of the fire weather districts … they seemed to stay in the high for a bit longer than what would seem practically relevant,” says Murray.

“We’ve made some changes this year, and we’re very confident that we’ll be better placed.”

WEATHERING THE CLIMATE STORM

As climate change continues to escalate the severity and frequency of extreme weather events, the ability to adapt quickly is becoming a fundamental part of our emergency warning systems.

And the AFDRS is designed to do just that.

“The system is agile enough to allow continual improvement,” says Murray.

Unlike its predecessor, the AFDRS is designed to evolve, ensuring that fire danger ratings remain relevant and accurate in a rapidly changing environment.

View Larger

Bushfire events are predicted to become more extreme and frequent as our climate continues to change.

Image credit: Department of Fire and Emergency Services
Bushfire events are predicted to become more extreme and frequent as our climate continues to change.

According to Murray, emergency departments like DFES are now able to take information from local governments, government agencies and volunteers and to implement changes to warnings in real time.

“The old system didn’t have that agility to continually enhance the sort of drivers, the back-end components of it. This one does,” says Murray.

“So we’re not scheduling another review, we will do it every day of the year … we will just keep updating any slight tweaks or modifications that are required.”

LOOKING AHEAD

The rollout of the AFDRS, while not without its challenges, represents a significant step forward in managing the threat of bushfires.

The system’s emphasis on simplicity and adaptability is crucial to its effectiveness. As we navigate a changing climate, the capacity of the AFDRS to evolve will play a vital role in protecting communities and managing bushfire risks more effectively.

Its advancements will ensure that we are better prepared for the future – not decades later but right now.


Interested in learning more about fire and its impact on the people and environment of Western Australia? Tune into the second season of the Elements podcast.

Across five episodes, we cover everything from festival bonfires to devastating wildfires, from echoes of ancient knowledge to the technological possibilities of the future.  It’s going to be lit🔥

All episodes out now on all your favourite podcast platforms.

Kyle Pauletto
About the author
Kyle Pauletto
Kyle Pauletto is a seasoned journalist and multimedia producer hailing from Perth, Western Australia. Kyle specialises in a spectrum of topics ranging from current affairs, science, technology, and culture in his freelance writing, podcasting, and music production.
View articles
Kyle Pauletto is a seasoned journalist and multimedia producer hailing from Perth, Western Australia. Kyle specialises in a spectrum of topics ranging from current affairs, science, technology, and culture in his freelance writing, podcasting, and music production.
View articles

NEXT ARTICLE

We've got chemistry, let's take it to the next level!

Get the latest WA science news delivered to your inbox, every fortnight.

Republish

Creative Commons Logo

Republishing our content

We want our stories to be shared and seen by as many people as possible.

Therefore, unless it says otherwise, copyright on the stories on Particle belongs to Scitech and they are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This allows you to republish our articles online or in print for free. You just need to credit us and link to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately.

Using the ‘republish’ button on our website is the easiest way to meet our guidelines.

Guidelines

You cannot edit the article.

When republishing, you have to credit our authors, ideally in the byline. You have to credit Particle with a link back to the original publication on Particle.

If you’re republishing online, you must use our pageview counter, link to us and include links from our story. Our page view counter is a small pixel-ping (invisible to the eye) that allows us to know when our content is republished. It’s a condition of our guidelines that you include our counter. If you use the ‘republish’ then you’ll capture our page counter.

If you’re republishing in print, please email us to let us so we know about it (we get very proud to see our work republished) and you must include the Particle logo next to the credits. Download logo here.

If you wish to republish all our stories, please contact us directly to discuss this opportunity.

Images

Most of the images used on Particle are copyright of the photographer who made them.

It is your responsibility to confirm that you’re licensed to republish images in our articles.

Video

All Particle videos can be accessed through YouTube under the Standard YouTube Licence.

The Standard YouTube licence

  1. This licence is ‘All Rights Reserved’, granting provisions for YouTube to display the content, and YouTube’s visitors to stream the content. This means that the content may be streamed from YouTube but specifically forbids downloading, adaptation, and redistribution, except where otherwise licensed. When uploading your content to YouTube it will automatically use the Standard YouTube licence. You can check this by clicking on Advanced Settings and looking at the dropdown box ‘License and rights ownership’.
  2. When a user is uploading a video he has license options that he can choose from. The first option is “standard YouTube License” which means that you grant the broadcasting rights to YouTube. This essentially means that your video can only be accessed from YouTube for watching purpose and cannot be reproduced or distributed in any other form without your consent.

Contact

For more information about using our content, email us: particle@scitech.org.au

Copy this HTML into your CMS
Press Ctrl+C to copy