Homegrown tech could give Australia an edge in green hydrogen

Green hydrogen could be a game-changer for Australia. So what's holding it up?
Alex Dook
Alex Dook
Freelance writer
Homegrown tech could give Australia an edge in green hydrogen
Image credit: Getty Images

As the transition to a green economy gathers pace, green hydrogen is cited as both a (potential) renewable fuel and an industrial game-changer.

In 2019, the federal government released a National Hydrogen Strategy, seeking to position Australia as a “major global player by 2030”.

However, industry figures such as Andrew Forrest, Executive Chairman of Fortescue Future Industries, have warned Australia may miss out on the opportunity to reach this goal if we don’t give incentives to the energy industry.

According to Andrew Forrest, Australia is losing capital, projects, people and technology to the USA and the European Union – who are providing large financial incentives to the renewable energy sector.


Politics aside, the commercialisation of green hydrogen is currently still plagued by numerous technological challenges.

Thankfully, clever people all across the country are ironing out these issues one by one.

One such example is Dr Nasir Mahmood from RMIT University’s School of Science. His team has recently published their research on making green hydrogen from seawater.


Green hydrogen is made in a process called electrolysis, which uses electricity to split water molecules (H2O) into hydrogen gas (H2) and oxygen gas (O2). The chemical equation looks something like this:

2 H2O (liquid) → 2 H2 (gas) + O2 (gas)

When hydrogen gas burns, there are no dirty carbon emissions. If the electricity source is green, then you’ve got an entirely renewable fuel.

What the process looks like on a small scale | RMIT

But green hydrogen is currently inefficient and expensive. Only 4% of manufactured hydrogen is produced through water electrolysis. The remaining 96% is produced from fossil fuels, which emit around 830 million tonnes of carbon dioxide a year.

According to Nasir, this is because what works in theory doesn’t always work in reality.

“Theoretically, water should split at 1.23 volts,” says Nasir.

“But in reality, it splits at higher energy levels.”

This theoretical number of 1.23V is based on pure, distilled water. But the most abundant forms of water (aka seawater) contain salts and other chemicals that interfere with electrolysis, driving up the energy and costs required to split it.

If you’re hoping Nasir has a clever solution to this problem, you’re in luck.


Catalysts are chemicals that encourage reactions without themselves being consumed. In the case of water electrolysis, the right catalyst can reduce the amount of energy needed to split seawater into hydrogen and oxygen.

Nasir has been working on a catalyst made of nitrogen-doped porous nickel molybdenum phosphide sheets (it sounds complicated because it is). This catalyst allows seawater to be split at much lower energy levels. Nasir hopes this will contribute to reducing the cost of hydrogen production to $2 per kg, which is widely seen as a benchmark of an economically viable industry. Currently, green hydrogen production costs $4–6 per kg.

Nasir’s catalyst also eliminates other problems that come with hydrogen production, like the creation of toxic chlorine gas.


Catalysts work because they play a precise role in chemical reactions. Seawater, however, doesn’t have a precise composition. It contains not only salt but a huge array of other chemical compounds, not to mention biological life.

“Even within a city, the composition of seawater can change. The west and east sides of Melbourne have seawater with different compositions,” says Nasir.

“We try to optimise our catalyst to work within a range of concentrations.”

This doesn’t mean one catalyst will work for every conceivable variation of seawater. But it can work for a much wider range than current technology.

It’s important to note that, while this technology shows great promise, it is still on a lab scale. For the catalyst to enter the commercial space, there is still work to be done.

“Our aim is to put these materials into the commercial appliances by 2025. We already have some support from industry.”

Nasir (centre) and his team | RMIT


So how is Australia’s hydrogen strategy going generally? In a statement to Particle, the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water stated:

“With over 100 projects underway and over 90% of production planned being green hydrogen, we need to keep our foot on the accelerator to achieve the scale of industry development necessary to compete internationally.”

Perhaps in recognition of the need to continue pushing forward, on 24 February 2023, representatives of all Australian governments agreed to review the National Hydrogen Strategy at the inaugural Energy and Climate Change Ministerial Council meeting.

“Actions like the refresh of the National Hydrogen Strategy will help Australia respond and react to the rapidly developing hydrogen industry.”

The Strategy review will soon be open for consultation, and is expected to be delivered before the end of 2023.”

There’s still a way to go with green hydrogen, both from a technological and economic perspective. And with the US and EU legislating generous subsidies, there is an urgent need for Australia to level up if we wish to become a global player.

Otherwise, we may risk losing cutting-edge and homegrown ideas to international investors.


Alex Dook
About the author
Alex Dook
Raised by a physics teacher and a university professor, Alex had no choice but to be a science nerd. He has worked in science communication in both Perth and Melbourne, mainly setting things on fire for delighted children. Alex is now a freelance science writer and content creator.
View articles
Raised by a physics teacher and a university professor, Alex had no choice but to be a science nerd. He has worked in science communication in both Perth and Melbourne, mainly setting things on fire for delighted children. Alex is now a freelance science writer and content creator.
View articles


We've got chemistry, let's take it to the next level!

Get the latest WA science news delivered to your inbox, every fortnight.


Creative Commons Logo

Republishing our content

We want our stories to be shared and seen by as many people as possible.

Therefore, unless it says otherwise, copyright on the stories on Particle belongs to Scitech and they are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This allows you to republish our articles online or in print for free. You just need to credit us and link to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately.

Using the ‘republish’ button on our website is the easiest way to meet our guidelines.


You cannot edit the article.

When republishing, you have to credit our authors, ideally in the byline. You have to credit Particle with a link back to the original publication on Particle.

If you’re republishing online, you must use our pageview counter, link to us and include links from our story. Our page view counter is a small pixel-ping (invisible to the eye) that allows us to know when our content is republished. It’s a condition of our guidelines that you include our counter. If you use the ‘republish’ then you’ll capture our page counter.

If you’re republishing in print, please email us to let us so we know about it (we get very proud to see our work republished) and you must include the Particle logo next to the credits. Download logo here.

If you wish to republish all our stories, please contact us directly to discuss this opportunity.


Most of the images used on Particle are copyright of the photographer who made them.

It is your responsibility to confirm that you’re licensed to republish images in our articles.


All Particle videos can be accessed through YouTube under the Standard YouTube Licence.

The Standard YouTube licence

  1. This licence is ‘All Rights Reserved’, granting provisions for YouTube to display the content, and YouTube’s visitors to stream the content. This means that the content may be streamed from YouTube but specifically forbids downloading, adaptation, and redistribution, except where otherwise licensed. When uploading your content to YouTube it will automatically use the Standard YouTube licence. You can check this by clicking on Advanced Settings and looking at the dropdown box ‘License and rights ownership’.
  2. When a user is uploading a video he has license options that he can choose from. The first option is “standard YouTube License” which means that you grant the broadcasting rights to YouTube. This essentially means that your video can only be accessed from YouTube for watching purpose and cannot be reproduced or distributed in any other form without your consent.


For more information about using our content, email us:

Copy this HTML into your CMS
Press Ctrl+C to copy