Get Regular Updates!
|Birth control: there’s an app for that



Natural Cycles

Birth control: there’s an app for that

Birth control: there’s an app for that

After 65 years of putting up with the pill’s side effects, women finally have an effective, drug-free alternative. And it’s all thanks to one badass lady scientist (and her husband).

Birth control: there’s an app for that

Meet Dr Elina Berglund. She’s a particle physicist who was part of the Nobel prize-winning team at CERN that discovered the Higgs boson particle.

And what does Elina, a badass scientist, do when she’s in need of an effective, natural form of birth control? She writes an algorithm for herself. Obviously.

And of course, her algorithm turns out to be so badass, it’s as effective as the pill.

So what does Elina do next? She turns it into an app for women around the world to use.

Natural Cycles

This was the birth (see what I did there?) of Natural Cycles, a company Elina founded with her husband and fellow physicist Dr Raoul Scherwitzl.

View Larger
Image|Natural Cycles
Natural Cycles founders Dr Elina Berglund and Dr Raoul Scherwitzl

According to their recently published study, the app is 93% effective with normal use and 99% effective with perfect use (the pill is 91% effective with normal use and 99% effective with perfect use). Natural Cycles is also the only app in Europe certified for use as birth control.

The app works by combining citizen science, data analysis and algorithms.

Every morning, users take their temperature with a special, clinical thermometer and input the data into the app. They also record the first day of their period. This data is used to determine when a user is ovulating and thus able to get pregnant. The app then advises when a user can have sex without getting pregnant.

The app can also be used for fertility and period tracking, which busy women know is an incredibly useful life hack.

And not only is it as effective as the pill, it’s cheaper and has no awful side effects.

Side effects? What side effects?

Late in 2016, a large Danish study found a link between depression and the use of hormonal contraceptives, such as the pill. Depending on age, they found there was up to an 80% chance of developing depression. The findings were significant as the dataset was massive: 1 million women over 13 years.

Most women knew about this link anecdotally—through their own experience or experience of their friends. However, this was somehow the first time birth control’s connection with depression was reflected in the research—despite the pill being in use for more than 65 years.

The research went viral, with women expressing feelings of validation all over the internet.

And more serious side effects are also emerging. Most recently, another Danish study reported women using the pill were 20% more likely to develop breast cancer.

Natural Cycles is a birth control app developed by Dr Elina Berglund, a particle physicist who was part of the Nobel prize-winning team at CERN that discovered the Higgs boson particle. The app has proven to be as effective as the Pill but comes without any of the growing list of negative side effects.
Hormonal contraceptives, including the pill have been linked to depression.

Artefacts have politics

The contrast between Natural Cycles and hormonal birth control provides an important reminder that science is not always neutral. Like any human activity, science and technology can be influenced by human biases and beliefs.

For example, Facebook may seem like a neutral technology, but in reality, the site’s design was shaped by CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s beliefs about identity (a design, incidentally, whose side effects also seem to be depression.)

Diversity matters beyond doing the right thing

Put another way, Natural Cycles is a demonstration of why we need diversity in science and technology.

Imagine the 1950s, back when the pill was originally being developed in the US. Women had nearly no voice in science, technology medicine or politics. Indeed, American women had only been granted the right to vote just 30 years earlier.

It’s perhaps not a surprise that from this cultural milieu emerged a birth control solution that was not ideal for women.

Holly Griggs-Spill, author of Sweetening the Pill, reported that the male researchers behind the pill considered a male contraceptive but rejected it “due to the number of side effects, including testicle shrinking”. Their conclusion was that women were more likely to put up with terrible side effects, because men expected a “better quality of life”.

Imagine if Elina Berglund and a team of women like her had been around back then.

Better late than never, right?

Particle Puns


Creative Commons Logo

Republishing our content

We want our stories to be shared and seen by as many people as possible.

Therefore, unless it says otherwise, copyright on the stories on Particle belongs to Scitech and they are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This allows you to republish our articles online or in print for free. You just need to credit us and link to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately.

Using the ‘republish’ button on our website is the easiest way to meet our guidelines.


You cannot edit the article.

When republishing, you have to credit our authors, ideally in the byline. You have to credit Particle with a link back to the original publication on Particle.

If you’re republishing online, you must use our pageview counter, link to us and include links from our story. Our page view counter is a small pixel-ping (invisible to the eye) that allows us to know when our content is republished. It’s a condition of our guidelines that you include our counter. If you use the ‘republish’ then you’ll capture our page counter.

If you’re republishing in print, please email us to let us so we know about it (we get very proud to see our work republished) and you must include the Particle logo next to the credits. Download logo here.

If you wish to republish all our stories, please contact us directly to discuss this opportunity.


Most of the images used on Particle are copyright of the photographer who made them.

It is your responsibility to confirm that you’re licensed to republish images in our articles.


All Particle videos can be accessed through YouTube under the Standard YouTube Licence.

The Standard YouTube licence

  1. This licence is ‘All Rights Reserved’, granting provisions for YouTube to display the content, and YouTube’s visitors to stream the content. This means that the content may be streamed from YouTube but specifically forbids downloading, adaptation, and redistribution, except where otherwise licensed. When uploading your content to YouTube it will automatically use the Standard YouTube licence. You can check this by clicking on Advanced Settings and looking at the dropdown box ‘License and rights ownership’.
  2. When a user is uploading a video he has license options that he can choose from. The first option is “standard YouTube License” which means that you grant the broadcasting rights to YouTube. This essentially means that your video can only be accessed from YouTube for watching purpose and cannot be reproduced or distributed in any other form without your consent.


For more information about using our content, email us:

Copy this HTML into your CMS
Press Ctrl+C to copy

We've got chemistry. Want something physical?