Get Regular Updates!


The trouble with rockets

The trouble with rockets

Space is big. Really big. It takes 10 years just to cross our Solar System. The next star is 70,000 years away at the same speed. So if we’re going to get anywhere, we’re going to need more than just rockets.

The trouble with rockets

When it comes to getting off the Earth, rockets are just about our only option.

They’re the only thing powerful enough to pull a spaceship out of Earth’s gravity. They release their energy quickly but not efficiently.

Once we’re in space, though, the maths changes.

Away from gravity, the atmosphere and anything else that can slow us down, we have a few more options.

Going nuclear

Regular rockets get their energy by burning fuel and oxygen. It’s fire—exactly the same reaction humans have been using to heat things up for thousands of years. One idea proposed in the 1960s is to use a nuclear reactor instead.

Rather than riding a jet of exploding fuel, a nuclear rocket would use the heat and pressure generated in a nuclear reactor. On Earth, this pressure is used to spin a turbine and create electricity, but in space, it would be directed out the back of a spacecraft to push it forwards.

NASA is looking into nuclear rockets as a faster way to get humans to Mars. Current spacecraft get one big kick to send them on their way and coast to their destination. A nuclear rocket could run continuously, accelerating all the way and potentially cutting travel time in half.

Video|NASA Video
NASA are using nuclear rockets (kilopower) as a way of getting humans to Mars

Nuclear engines are efficient, but they still need fuel. What if there was a way to travel through space without using any fuel at all?

Electric dreams

Our planet is surrounded by a magnetic field. It’s powerful enough to spin even the tiny magnet in a compass needle. Make that compass needle bigger and put it in space, and you’ve got an electrodynamic tether.

Electrodynamic tethers move through space using electromagnets to change their magnetic field. Charge it so it opposes Earth’s field, and you speed up. Put it in reverse, and you slow down. This technique is already being investigated for use on satellites—but what about travelling beyond Earth’s magnetic field?

Without air resistance or fuel limits, a spinning space tether could build up some serious momentum. Attach a spacecraft to one end and release it when it’s pointing the right way, and your space tether is suddenly a space catapult.

Catching a gravity wave

No matter how efficient we make our engines though, there’s one limit we can’t break—the speed of light. The closer any spacecraft gets to the speed of light, the more energy it takes to increase its speed. Reaching the speed of light, even if it were possible, would take an infinite amount of power.

The strangest spacecraft designs are the ones that try to bend this speed limit. One idea proposes stretching space itself out ahead of the ship and bunching it up behind, like a warp drive in a sci-fi movie. The spacecraft never actually breaks the speed of light, but the wave of bent space it’s surfing on theoretically could, pulling the spacecraft with it.

The only problem is that this engine needs a type of matter with negative mass—a substance whose gravity pushes rather than pulling. If that sounds like it breaks the laws of physics, that’s because right now it does. Making this kind of matter may well prove impossible.

How stretching and bending of space time could be used to travel through space, like on a warp drive in a sci-fi movie

Down to Earth

Most of these ideas are just that—ideas. For now, we’re probably stuck with rockets, not nuclear space catapults and impossible substances. But hey, less than a hundred years ago, any kind of space travel seemed just as absurd. If there’s one thing we know for sure, it’s that you never know for sure what the future will hold.

For more weird and wonderful futuristic spacecraft, check out the Faster Than Light show now playing in the Scitech Planetarium every day until April. Check the daily what’s on for tickets and show times.

Particle Puns


Creative Commons Logo

Republishing our content

We want our stories to be shared and seen by as many people as possible.

Therefore, unless it says otherwise, copyright on the stories on Particle belongs to Scitech and they are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This allows you to republish our articles online or in print for free. You just need to credit us and link to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately.

Using the ‘republish’ button on our website is the easiest way to meet our guidelines.


You cannot edit the article.

When republishing, you have to credit our authors, ideally in the byline. You have to credit Particle with a link back to the original publication on Particle.

If you’re republishing online, you must use our pageview counter, link to us and include links from our story. Our page view counter is a small pixel-ping (invisible to the eye) that allows us to know when our content is republished. It’s a condition of our guidelines that you include our counter. If you use the ‘republish’ then you’ll capture our page counter.

If you’re republishing in print, please email us to let us so we know about it (we get very proud to see our work republished) and you must include the Particle logo next to the credits. Download logo here.

If you wish to republish all our stories, please contact us directly to discuss this opportunity.


Most of the images used on Particle are copyright of the photographer who made them.

It is your responsibility to confirm that you’re licensed to republish images in our articles.


All Particle videos can be accessed through YouTube under the Standard YouTube Licence.

The Standard YouTube licence

  1. This licence is ‘All Rights Reserved’, granting provisions for YouTube to display the content, and YouTube’s visitors to stream the content. This means that the content may be streamed from YouTube but specifically forbids downloading, adaptation, and redistribution, except where otherwise licensed. When uploading your content to YouTube it will automatically use the Standard YouTube licence. You can check this by clicking on Advanced Settings and looking at the dropdown box ‘License and rights ownership’.
  2. When a user is uploading a video he has license options that he can choose from. The first option is “standard YouTube License” which means that you grant the broadcasting rights to YouTube. This essentially means that your video can only be accessed from YouTube for watching purpose and cannot be reproduced or distributed in any other form without your consent.


For more information about using our content, email us:

Copy this HTML into your CMS
Press Ctrl+C to copy

We've got chemistry. Want something physical?