Open Menu
Get Regular Updates!

People

Search
|Why people hate maths and how to fix it
Why people hate maths and how to fix it

Why people hate maths and how to fix it

What do you think of when you think of maths? If you’re like most people, it’s probably something like: numbers, equations, boredom, anxiety and pain.

Why people hate maths and how to fix it

Then there are the weird ones, like me, who call themselves mathematicians. When we think of maths, we think of shapes, colours, patterns, creativity, freedom, insight and the feeling of making deep connections.

Why is there such a huge gap between how mathematicians and the general population see and experience maths?

The myth of the maths gift

So many people give up on engaging with maths from a young age, deciding, “I am just not a maths person, I’m not good at maths.”

There is a deeply entrenched view in our society that ability to learn and master mathematical understanding comes from an inborn gift rather than from hard work and perseverance.

When we hold this view from a young age, the maths classroom becomes a place where we are constantly being judged not good enough, a place of repeated failure and shame.

And with each failed test, with each time we’re put on the spot to answer a question we’re not prepared for, we think, “See, I’m really not a maths person. Get me out of here, I don’t belong.”

Then grows maths anxiety.

The work of academics like Carol Dweck and Jo Boaler of Stanford University suggests that the strongest predictor of achievement in maths is mindset—specifically, whether you believe you can grow your maths ability or whether it is fixed.

Come again? You’re saying I just have to believe I’m good at maths and then I can be?

Not quite.

You just have to believe you can be better and then you can. Working at maths over a long period of time with this belief, you will see significant improvement. Remember The Little Engine That Could? Belief and effort get you over the hill, in maths, just like everything else.

What do you think of when you think of maths? If you’re like most people, it’s probably something like: numbers, equations, boredom, anxiety and pain.
Image|The Little Engine that Could by Watty Piper
"I think I can, I think I can ..."
The strongest predictor of achievement in maths is mindset—specifically, whether you believe you can grow your maths ability or whether it is fixed.

Students with a fixed mindset create a self-fulfilling prophecy. Because they believe they have no ability at maths, when they encounter a problem or something they don’t know, they give up easily.

Students with a growth mindset will try again and again and again, use different strategies and find help from different sources.

An analysis of achievement against mindset of the 2016 international maths test, PISA, showed a gap in achievement equivalent to a year and a half between students with a fixed mindset and students with a growth mindset.

A lack of connection

So OK, you say, if I change my belief around maths and “I think I can, I think I can”, I can learn a lot more. But why would I want to? That still doesn’t stop maths being boring and irrelevant, right?

Now here is perhaps a bigger problem.

I just asked my housemate what the second most read book in the world was.

When I told her it’s Euclid’s The Elements, she said, “How? I’ve never even heard of it!”

This is precisely the response I’d expect if I randomly asked someone on the street.

It’s the initial treatise on the basics of geometry, with revolutionary facts like the shortest distance between two points is a straight line and parallel lines never meet.

The rigour of reasoning and proof was unmatched until the 19th century—it is a masterpiece of reasoning and logical thought.

The world we now live in is literally built on the works like this and the works of DescartesPythagoras and Newton. (Hey, you know the guy who had an apple fall on his head? Turns out he also casually invented calculus in order to have a means to figure out the mass of the Earth.)

Professor Edward Frenkel makes the argument that mathematicians have done a bad job of promoting themselves. The masterpieces of art and literature and even science (think da Vinci, Shakespeare, Einstein) are very different. Even if we haven’t seen them directly or read them, we know them as a fundamental part of our culture, and we know their beauty.

As mathematicians, we haven’t shared this beauty of the masterpieces in a way that has allowed the general population to appreciate them.

But more of a travesty than this is the way traditional education has presented maths as a set of disconnected procedures: add these two numbers, multiply the base by the height, find x …

This bores me.

I taught maths as a high school teacher and had to teach like this. My students were bored too.

There are two big things missing: connection of ideas and connection to the real world.

To present maths in a way that isn’t horribly boring, you actually only need one of these two (but both together is great as well).

I’ve been doing something different lately in my work with Scitech as a professional learning consultant: inquiry maths. I go into classes and bring coloured geometrical shapes, rods and fraction circles, and I set focused tasks of exploration.

Inquiry maths encourages students to play and ask their own questions. View Larger
Inquiry maths encourages students to play and ask their own questions
Coloured geometrical shapes, rods and fraction circles are great tools to make maths engaging. View Larger
Coloured geometrical shapes, rods and fraction circles are great tools to make maths engaging

Students play, seek out patterns, ask their own questions, discuss and debate their ideas.

I used to ask a class of 30 students who liked maths, and two students would put their hand up.

I’ve taken this approach into more than 60 classrooms and consistently seen a whole classroom engaged and excited about mathematical ideas.

People enjoy connecting ideas.

In an example of real-world maths, I recently set a task for a couple of hundred students to figure out how much area it would take to power the whole of WA in solar power. They worked in small groups, fully self-motivated to tackle the problem for an hour.

People enjoy tackling big problems that connect to the real world.

View Larger
Students tackling a real-world maths problem by figuring our how much power would be needed to run WA on solar power

The good news

The things I’ve been doing are just small-scale examples of great movements in maths education and engagement happening around the world.

Youcubed.org provides courses for teachers, parents and students to rediscover the joy of mathematics. Tens of thousands of people have tried these.

Math for Love, in Seattle, is doing similar work creating an alternative curriculum around problem-solving and investigation. Try the Diffy Squares task for an experience of playful thought-provoking maths anyone can do.

Dan Meyer teaches maths using videos of real-world scenarios in his 3-Acts maths lessons.

The public profile of maths is lifting as well through the works of YouTube channels like Numberphile and Veritasium, websites like the popular comic xkcd and the growing profession of the maths communicator (check out Hannah Fry below or Vi Hart) and even the maths comedian (check out Matt Parker or Simon Pampena).

View Larger
Image|xkcd
xkcd comics are helping to raise the public profile of maths

If you’re one of those people who hated maths, just aren’t “a maths person” or think it doesn’t matter, I hope next time you think about maths you remember there’s a whole world of beauty, connection and understanding to tap into if you can just make the effort.

Particle
Puns

Postcard #10
If you’re not part of the solution, you’re a part of the precipitate.

Republish

Creative Commons Logo

Republishing our content

We want our stories to be shared and seen by as many people as possible.

Therefore, unless it says otherwise, copyright on the stories on Particle belongs to Scitech and they are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This allows you to republish our articles online or in print for free. You just need to credit us and link to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately.

Using the ‘republish’ button on our website is the easiest way to meet our guidelines.

Guidelines

You cannot edit the article.

When republishing, you have to credit our authors, ideally in the byline. You have to credit Particle with a link back to the original publication on Particle.

If you’re republishing online, you must use our pageview counter, link to us and include links from our story. Our page view counter is a small pixel-ping (invisible to the eye) that allows us to know when our content is republished. It’s a condition of our guidelines that you include our counter. If you use the ‘republish’ then you’ll capture our page counter.

If you’re republishing in print, please email us to let us so we know about it (we get very proud to see our work republished) and you must include the Particle logo next to the credits. Download logo here.

If you wish to republish all our stories, please contact us directly to discuss this opportunity.

Images

Most of the images used on Particle are copyright of the photographer who made them.

It is your responsibility to confirm that you’re licensed to republish images in our articles.

Video

All Particle videos can be accessed through YouTube under the Standard YouTube Licence.

The Standard YouTube licence

  1. This licence is ‘All Rights Reserved’, granting provisions for YouTube to display the content, and YouTube’s visitors to stream the content. This means that the content may be streamed from YouTube but specifically forbids downloading, adaptation, and redistribution, except where otherwise licensed. When uploading your content to YouTube it will automatically use the Standard YouTube licence. You can check this by clicking on Advanced Settings and looking at the dropdown box ‘License and rights ownership’.
  2. When a user is uploading a video he has license options that he can choose from. The first option is “standard YouTube License” which means that you grant the broadcasting rights to YouTube. This essentially means that your video can only be accessed from YouTube for watching purpose and cannot be reproduced or distributed in any other form without your consent.

Contact

For more information about using our content, email us: particle@scitech.org.au

Copy this HTML into your CMS
Press Ctrl+C to copy

We've got chemistry. Want something physical?