Dress code division

Do strict dress codes and uniforms do more harm than good?

Kerri Duncan
Kerri Duncan
Freelance Writer
Dress code division
Image credit: Getty Images

How do you feel when you wear a uniform?

Are you relieved by the simplicity or resentful of the restrictions?

The pros and cons of dress codes have long been a source of debate in schools and workplaces.

Many claim uniforms evoke a sense of unity, reduce distractions and result in higher-quality work.

But new WA research suggests school uniforms can also normalise misogyny, homophobia, transphobia and racism.

This can lead to long-term impacts for affected students.

Murdoch University’s Associate Professor Wendy Cumming-Potvin says these impacts can’t be ignored.


The idea that different genders should wear different clothing has changed a lot over the years.

Until the end of the 19th century, Western children were dressed in long tunics or robes, regardless of their gender.

In the 17th century, aristocratic men and women both wore fancy hats and outfits of lace and silk.

View Larger

Painting of an aristocratic couple in 1678

Image credit: Eglon van der Neer, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Painting of an aristocratic couple in 1678
View Larger

A 1605 portrait of Bianca degli Utili Maselli with her daughter and five sons

Image credit: Lavinia Fontana, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
A 1605 portrait of Bianca degli Utili Maselli with her daughter and five sons

Pink used to be considered a strong, masculine colour, while blue was dainty and feminine.

“Nowadays, some scholars suggest men’s clothing is designed for comfort. A good deal of women’s fashion is still restrictive and impractical,” says Wendy.

A great example of this – and a pet peeve for many – is the lack of pockets on women’s clothing.

“Or they have ‘fake’ pockets,” notes Wendy.


When applied to a school uniform setting, enforcement of gendered clothing can affect students disproportionately.

Skirt lengths, for example, are often strictly policed for girls, while there is no equivalent enforcement for boys.

In many instances, skirts and pants may only be worn by genders deemed appropriate by the school. And not everyone is a fan of these strict rules.

Students at one high school in Quebec, Canada, created a social media movement by posting photos of boys wearing skirts to school.

They said they were protesting the school’s overly restrictive rules that promoted sexism, homophobia and toxic masculinity.


The rules can be especially uncomfortable for those still learning about their gender or sexual identity.

Kim Andreassen didn’t know they were trans-non-binary while in high school. But they were sure of one thing. They felt uncomfortable with their school’s dress code. The discomfort was enough to contribute towards them dropping out of Year 11.

“[The school] had a very gendered uniform policy, which restricted me to dresses only, long hair etc.,” they say.

“I was perpetually uncomfortable and confused why.”

Kim says they were lucky to have gone back to school and go on to work at SECCA and Curtin’s School of Education.

“I think for many … rigid dress codes might play a real part in why they can’t go to school,” says Kim.


Dr Danila Marini is a non-binary researcher at the University of Adelaide.

They say they forged their mum’s signature at school to avoid strict gender-based dress codes.

“I was never comfortable in [dresses and long skirts]. It definitely impacted my comfort and confidence,” says Danila.

“If you had hair longer than shoulder length, it needed a ponytail. I hated it. I asked mum to cut my hair short to avoid [it].”

Danila’s high school was not as strict as their primary school. They say the flexible uniform was a more comfortable balance of self-expression and convenience.

“[A uniform] takes the pressure off having a new outfit every day. It also removes issues of class inequality. My mum couldn’t afford to buy me clothes often, so the [flexible] uniform was a blessing for her,” they say.

Despite feeling lucky to have had some choice in what they wore, Danila admits they can still “get stressed over what to wear and how to present [themselves].”

“Being forced to wear a uniform that goes against your feelings … [is] a daily reminder that you are somehow ‘wrong’,” says Danila.


Similarly, people of colour and those from diverse cultural backgrounds may be distressed or avoid school if the dress code makes them uncomfortable.

“The US National Women’s Law Center reported that many girls miss class over accusations about their clothes, make-up or hairstyle,” says Wendy.

“For African American girls, these policies can be more discriminatory.”

View Larger
Image credit: Getty Images

Some traditional hairstyles or head coverings such as afros and head scarfs are deemed “unacceptable” by some school authorities.

For students, these attitudes and rules can lead to future identity issues and higher dropout rates.

“Low education levels can lead to negative life situations, like unemployment and homelessness,” highlights Wendy.


Several studies have found evidence supporting the positive effects of uniforms such as improved attentiveness and academic performance.

Some schools cite safety concerns such as dress codes reducing the likelihood of gang-related violence.

Wendy suggests a holistic approach is needed to create and implement dress code policies.

“From my perspective, there are advantages and limitations to having school uniforms,” she says.

“Dress code policies [should] be integrated with other policies focusing on equity, diversity and inclusion.”

“[These] can also be informed by professional development for school staff, highlighting … student wellbeing.

“It is important to … develop and implement a culture of inclusiveness.”

Kerri Duncan
About the author
Kerri Duncan
Kerri is an Adelaide-based freelance writer with a background in animal science and molecular biology. Always up for an investigative adventure, Kerri is addicted to exploring Earth's wonders and finding as many waterfalls as possible. Her work in life sciences has deepened her appreciation of the natural world and she feels compelled to write about it.
View articles
Kerri is an Adelaide-based freelance writer with a background in animal science and molecular biology. Always up for an investigative adventure, Kerri is addicted to exploring Earth's wonders and finding as many waterfalls as possible. Her work in life sciences has deepened her appreciation of the natural world and she feels compelled to write about it.
View articles


We've got chemistry, let's take it to the next level!

Get the latest WA science news delivered to your inbox, every fortnight.


Creative Commons Logo

Republishing our content

We want our stories to be shared and seen by as many people as possible.

Therefore, unless it says otherwise, copyright on the stories on Particle belongs to Scitech and they are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This allows you to republish our articles online or in print for free. You just need to credit us and link to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately.

Using the ‘republish’ button on our website is the easiest way to meet our guidelines.


You cannot edit the article.

When republishing, you have to credit our authors, ideally in the byline. You have to credit Particle with a link back to the original publication on Particle.

If you’re republishing online, you must use our pageview counter, link to us and include links from our story. Our page view counter is a small pixel-ping (invisible to the eye) that allows us to know when our content is republished. It’s a condition of our guidelines that you include our counter. If you use the ‘republish’ then you’ll capture our page counter.

If you’re republishing in print, please email us to let us so we know about it (we get very proud to see our work republished) and you must include the Particle logo next to the credits. Download logo here.

If you wish to republish all our stories, please contact us directly to discuss this opportunity.


Most of the images used on Particle are copyright of the photographer who made them.

It is your responsibility to confirm that you’re licensed to republish images in our articles.


All Particle videos can be accessed through YouTube under the Standard YouTube Licence.

The Standard YouTube licence

  1. This licence is ‘All Rights Reserved’, granting provisions for YouTube to display the content, and YouTube’s visitors to stream the content. This means that the content may be streamed from YouTube but specifically forbids downloading, adaptation, and redistribution, except where otherwise licensed. When uploading your content to YouTube it will automatically use the Standard YouTube licence. You can check this by clicking on Advanced Settings and looking at the dropdown box ‘License and rights ownership’.
  2. When a user is uploading a video he has license options that he can choose from. The first option is “standard YouTube License” which means that you grant the broadcasting rights to YouTube. This essentially means that your video can only be accessed from YouTube for watching purpose and cannot be reproduced or distributed in any other form without your consent.


For more information about using our content, email us:

Copy this HTML into your CMS
Press Ctrl+C to copy