US$560 billion of wasted fish over the past half century

Current techniques used in industrial fishing have left a devastating trail of wasted dead fish.
Karl Gruber
Karl Gruber
Freelance Science Writer
US$560 billion of wasted fish over the past half century

Throughout history, humans have come up with many different ways to catch fish. But bottom trawling is by far the most damaging and wasteful of the lot.

This is the key and troubling finding of a new study. It turns out that over 437 million tonnes of fish, worth about US$560 billion, have been dumped back in the ocean over the past 65 years.

“Industrial bottom trawling is widely used today to catch fish species in bulk. The most famous example is the North Atlantic cod, whose populations off the North American coast collapsed in dramatic fashion in the early 1990s,” says Dirk Zeller, a fisheries scientist at UWA and co-author of the study.

The study used a massive database from the Sea Around Us research initiative, which tracked down fish catch data from the past 65 years. The project has been collecting data from different fishing practices around the world, including reported and unreported catches by country, fishing sector, year and species.

The data also included bycatch—unwanted animals—most killed in the fishing process and returned to the sea. The study’s main goal is to understand how industrial and artisan fisheries affect the marine environment.

View Larger

Commercial fishing vessel

View Larger

Traditional fishing

Using this database, researchers discovered the alarming figure of 437 million tonnes of discarded bycatch from bottom trawling. These findings build on a previous study by the same group, which found that, in recent years, nearly 10 million tonnes of fish are wasted as bycatch each year.

The trouble with trawlers

“Bottom trawlers are really big nets attached to a heavy structure that sinks to the bottom of the ocean. This structure is then towed by a high-powered fishing boat, scraping across the ocean floor,” explains Dirk.

As the trawler tears up the seafloor, anything in its path will become catch.

Consequently, tonnes of unwanted fish, invertebrates, plants and corals are all captured, killed and destroyed in the trawling process.

View Larger

A shark caught as bycatch

A shark caught as bycatch

“This fishing method is the most wasteful way to do commercial fishing,” Dirk says.

It is also needlessly wasteful. Many of the fish species captured are perfectly fit for human consumption. They are just not the most valuable ones, explains the study’s co-author Maria Deng Palomares in a press release, so they get dumped overboard.

“Had they landed that catch, they would have made US$560 billion according to our prices dataset. The worst part is that, in general, bottom trawlers are so expensive to operate that the only way to keep them afloat is by giving them government subsidies. In other words, it’s a wasteful and inefficient practice,” adds Maria.

All in all, a bad deal.

Fishing for the future

Dirk hopes that the information gathered in their new study will help improve things. It may reveal how many fish are being removed from the ocean unnecessarily by different fishing techniques. This information could help evaluate the cost and benefits of current fisheries approaches, so we can allocate resources to the ones that are both higher value and take better care of our oceans.

View Larger

Bycatch in the shrimp industry—all this fish goes to waste

View Larger

Overfishing has serious environmental and economic consequences

“This information can also be used to boost artisanal fisheries. As the data shows, with very little infrastructure and support, they already generate more value,” says co-author Daniel Pauly, principal investigator of the Sea Around Us in a press release.

There is a real need to change the current business model used in fisheries, for example, by shifting some of the $35 billion in subsidies that industrial fisheries get every year to more sustainable ones. Redirecting some of these funds to non-bottom trawl artisanal fisheries would make a difference, explains Dirk.

“This would allow them to follow a more sustainable artisanal fisheries practice. They would be able to employ more people and take better care of their catch. It would also lead to a reduction in the amount of food-grade fish that are discarded or turned into low-value livestock feed,” concludes Dirk.

With this information at hand, Dirk says, we know exactly what we are doing to fish stocks and ecosystems by fishing, and we also know how to fix the overfishing problem.

“Now it needs the political will and public pressure to effect the required changes. A good example is that, around the developing world, increasingly, small-scale fisheries are finding their voice and starting standing up to the excessive industrial exploitation to safeguard their small-scale fisheries.”

Karl Gruber
About the author
Karl Gruber
Karl is an Evolutionary Biologist and a science communicator, passionate about the beauty behind science.
View articles
Karl is an Evolutionary Biologist and a science communicator, passionate about the beauty behind science.
View articles


We've got chemistry, let's take it to the next level!

Get the latest WA science news delivered to your inbox, every fortnight.


Creative Commons Logo

Republishing our content

We want our stories to be shared and seen by as many people as possible.

Therefore, unless it says otherwise, copyright on the stories on Particle belongs to Scitech and they are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This allows you to republish our articles online or in print for free. You just need to credit us and link to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately.

Using the ‘republish’ button on our website is the easiest way to meet our guidelines.


You cannot edit the article.

When republishing, you have to credit our authors, ideally in the byline. You have to credit Particle with a link back to the original publication on Particle.

If you’re republishing online, you must use our pageview counter, link to us and include links from our story. Our page view counter is a small pixel-ping (invisible to the eye) that allows us to know when our content is republished. It’s a condition of our guidelines that you include our counter. If you use the ‘republish’ then you’ll capture our page counter.

If you’re republishing in print, please email us to let us so we know about it (we get very proud to see our work republished) and you must include the Particle logo next to the credits. Download logo here.

If you wish to republish all our stories, please contact us directly to discuss this opportunity.


Most of the images used on Particle are copyright of the photographer who made them.

It is your responsibility to confirm that you’re licensed to republish images in our articles.


All Particle videos can be accessed through YouTube under the Standard YouTube Licence.

The Standard YouTube licence

  1. This licence is ‘All Rights Reserved’, granting provisions for YouTube to display the content, and YouTube’s visitors to stream the content. This means that the content may be streamed from YouTube but specifically forbids downloading, adaptation, and redistribution, except where otherwise licensed. When uploading your content to YouTube it will automatically use the Standard YouTube licence. You can check this by clicking on Advanced Settings and looking at the dropdown box ‘License and rights ownership’.
  2. When a user is uploading a video he has license options that he can choose from. The first option is “standard YouTube License” which means that you grant the broadcasting rights to YouTube. This essentially means that your video can only be accessed from YouTube for watching purpose and cannot be reproduced or distributed in any other form without your consent.


For more information about using our content, email us:

Copy this HTML into your CMS
Press Ctrl+C to copy