“Sharks are bad”—a great white lie

Marine scientists are calling for ‘wilderness’ ocean reserves to protect sharks.
​Lisa Morrison
​Lisa Morrison
Freelance reporter
“Sharks are bad”—a great white lie

The British Indian Ocean Territory Marine Reserve (BMR) was established in 2010 and covers 640,000 square kilometres between Tanzania and Indonesia in the central Indian Ocean. This marine reserve is 800 times bigger than New York City and the largest of its kind.

The remote archipelago is one of the best places on the planet to study reef ecosystems because fishing is banned.

UWA marine biologists Jessica Meeuwig and David Tickler and colleagues from the Zoological Society of London are studying different types of sharks in the reserve.

They are calling for more ‘marine wilderness’ areas to protect shark populations.


“Sharks are important for reef ecosystems because they keep the rest of the food chain in balance,” David says.

“Reef systems are a complex interlocking web of predator and prey relationships,” he says.

“Disturbing one element of that system has knock-on effects throughout the reef.”

If you take away sharks, larger fish increase and eat fish that eat algae, which keep the reef healthy.

View Larger

A grey reef shark

Image credit: Marine Futures Laboratory/UWA
A grey reef shark


Demand for shark meat and fins and sharks’ slow reproductive rates are factors of dramatic global declines.

“Grey reef and silvertip sharks only produce seven to 10 pups every 2 years, which for marine life is incredibly slow,” David says.

Setting aside large, totally protected areas could help rebuild their populations.

David says Australia’s most iconic protected area—the Great Barrier Reef—is actually zoned into much smaller areas with very different levels of protection for sharks.


The researchers used baited remote underwater video systems (BRUVS) to survey sharks and fish at 35 sites in 2012.

BRUVS consist of two GoPro cameras attached to a frame to mimic what our eyes see underwater. They are often used in underwater research, including the artificial reef surveys in WA.

View Larger

Dr Tom Letessier, Dr Bob Long and Professor Jessica Meeuwig preparing the BRUVS

Image credit: David Tickler, UWA
View Larger

Dr Tom Letessier operates the BRUVS

Image credit: Marine Futures Laboratory/UWA

The expedition was the first BRUVS survey of the reserve and collected valuable baseline data, David says.

They counted 22,583 fish from 292 species and 271 sharks from eight species during 138 hours of footage.


Tawny nurse, whitetip reef, blacktip reef, grey reef, silvertip, scalloped hammerhead and great hammerhead sharks forage to find fish.

“It sounds like a bit of a no-brainer, but prey is really important to these animals,” David says.

“Because they’re large, mobile predators, they’re not tied to the reef for shelter.”

David says food availability could be more important than habitat for shark conservation.

A grey reef shark

Image credit: Marine Futures Laboratory/UWA
A grey reef shark


“Marine wilderness areas encompassing reef ecosystems may conserve sharks better than protecting individual species,” David says.

“We need to start thinking about protecting big marine predators in the same way we have gone about protecting big predators on land,” he says.

“You don’t protect lion populations by declaring lions off limits but hunting everything else, because it obviously isn’t going to work.

“We set aside large areas of wilderness so they can operate at an ecosystem scale.”

“If you don’t have wilderness areas, predatory species are going to struggle.”

UWA co-author Professor Jessica Meeuwig agrees. “Like the predators of the African plains, sharks dominate the marine ecosystems of the ‘Blue Serengeti’, providing valuable ecosystem services as well as direct benefits to industries such as dive tourism. Fully protected marine reserves are a vital tool to help rebuild their populations,” she says.

View Larger

A grey reef shark with a BRUVS

Image credit: Marine Futures Laboratory/UWA
A grey reef shark with a BRUVS
​Lisa Morrison
About the author
​Lisa Morrison
Lisa is a freelance journalist based in Albany, WA. She has four years' experience as a news reporter for newspapers in Esperance and Albany, and three years' experience as a science writer for websites. She enjoys tracking down and telling interesting stories.
View articles
Lisa is a freelance journalist based in Albany, WA. She has four years' experience as a news reporter for newspapers in Esperance and Albany, and three years' experience as a science writer for websites. She enjoys tracking down and telling interesting stories.
View articles


We've got chemistry, let's take it to the next level!

Get the latest WA science news delivered to your inbox, every fortnight.


Creative Commons Logo

Republishing our content

We want our stories to be shared and seen by as many people as possible.

Therefore, unless it says otherwise, copyright on the stories on Particle belongs to Scitech and they are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This allows you to republish our articles online or in print for free. You just need to credit us and link to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately.

Using the ‘republish’ button on our website is the easiest way to meet our guidelines.


You cannot edit the article.

When republishing, you have to credit our authors, ideally in the byline. You have to credit Particle with a link back to the original publication on Particle.

If you’re republishing online, you must use our pageview counter, link to us and include links from our story. Our page view counter is a small pixel-ping (invisible to the eye) that allows us to know when our content is republished. It’s a condition of our guidelines that you include our counter. If you use the ‘republish’ then you’ll capture our page counter.

If you’re republishing in print, please email us to let us so we know about it (we get very proud to see our work republished) and you must include the Particle logo next to the credits. Download logo here.

If you wish to republish all our stories, please contact us directly to discuss this opportunity.


Most of the images used on Particle are copyright of the photographer who made them.

It is your responsibility to confirm that you’re licensed to republish images in our articles.


All Particle videos can be accessed through YouTube under the Standard YouTube Licence.

The Standard YouTube licence

  1. This licence is ‘All Rights Reserved’, granting provisions for YouTube to display the content, and YouTube’s visitors to stream the content. This means that the content may be streamed from YouTube but specifically forbids downloading, adaptation, and redistribution, except where otherwise licensed. When uploading your content to YouTube it will automatically use the Standard YouTube licence. You can check this by clicking on Advanced Settings and looking at the dropdown box ‘License and rights ownership’.
  2. When a user is uploading a video he has license options that he can choose from. The first option is “standard YouTube License” which means that you grant the broadcasting rights to YouTube. This essentially means that your video can only be accessed from YouTube for watching purpose and cannot be reproduced or distributed in any other form without your consent.


For more information about using our content, email us:

Copy this HTML into your CMS
Press Ctrl+C to copy