Get Regular Updates!
Search

People

image|

congerdesign from Pixabay

What’s the worst sound in the world?

What’s the worst sound in the world?

Screech! Bang! Crash! In the contest for 'Worst Sound in the World' there are many contenders. Who takes home the gold?

What’s the worst sound in the world?

What’s the worst sound in the world? For you it might be a baby crying, nails on a chalkboard or an annoying sibling’s voice. But which sound really takes the title?

Sound travels as waves of energy that are measured in hertz (Hz), which is the number of waves per second.

If two sound waves are played at the same volume, the one that is higher pitched will hit you with more energy.

Video| CrashCourse
It’s all in the waves

But high pitched sound waves aren’t very good at passing through solid objects. As a result, it’s easy to insulate a room against high pitched sounds but much harder to insulate against low pitch sounds.

Scraping the surface

In 2012, a study of 13 volunteers at Newcastle University, ranked the unpleasantness of different sounds. The study showed higher frequency sounds to be the most unpleasant.

The very worst? A knife scraping against a bottle.

View Larger
Sound has a profound effect on our health and well-being

The study was pretty small, so this probably isn’t the worst sound in the world. Can we beat it?

Dr Jordan Lacey researches soundscape design at RMIT. His research involves transforming our city spaces to reduce noise pollution.

“Sound isn’t something you can just look at objectively. It also affects our bodily and emotional states,” says Jordan.

“Sound has a special place in our hearts because of music but sound can also be used negatively, even insidiously.”

Sound of the police

The Mosquito is one device that takes advantage of our dislike of high-pitch sounds.

As we become adults, the top range of our hearing decreases from around 20,000Hz to 15,000Hz. The Mosquito takes advantage of this to stop loitering, by playing a deterrent tone at 17,000Hz to target teenagers.

The sound is so bad there have been reported cases of physical illness, even by adults who cannot hear it.

Another contestant for worst sound is the Long Range Acoustic Devices (LRADs) that release a beam of sound at 2,000-3,000Hz which is as loud as a jet engine. Police officers infamously used the LRADs (aka sound cannons) to disperse Black Lives Matter protestors in the US.

According to the police, LRADs are allegedly safer alternatives to pepper spray and tear gas.

A police officer wearing a NYPD jackets stands next to a large speaker at a protest
Image|Z22/Wikimedia Commons
A NY police officer using an LRAD during Occupy Wallstreet in 2011
But because they’re such a new weapon, there’s a lack of research on how LRADs affect our health.

“There’s no legislation yet saying what situations the police can use LRADs in or the acceptable levels of noise. Sound is invisible, so it’s easy to dismiss it as not having an effect but that’s not the reality,” says Jordan.

US courts are now ruling on lawful LRAD use, but they don’t take our ‘Worst Sound’ title.

Road warriors

In Western Europe, one million years of good health are lost to the noise pollution of traffic. Jordan works on this noise pollution in Australian cities.

“The government builds noise walls around motorways. That cuts down the noise but it’s still unpleasant. Instead, I’m trying to smooth out the frequency spectrum,” Jordan says.

View Larger
It’s hard to argue that rush-hour traffic tops the list

His work uses biophilic design – meaning designing things based on humans’ love of the natural. The goal is to turn a busy motorway into an environmental sound.

“Sudden noises like acceleration and air brakes are more distracting, so by smoothing out the frequency spectrum we lessen their impact. It doesn’t remove the noise, but it makes it easier to listen to.”

So as it turns out, your car may be the worst sound in the world.

Better get a bike!

Image|Netflix via GIPHY

Particle Puns

Republish

Creative Commons Logo

Republishing our content

We want our stories to be shared and seen by as many people as possible.

Therefore, unless it says otherwise, copyright on the stories on Particle belongs to Scitech and they are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This allows you to republish our articles online or in print for free. You just need to credit us and link to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately.

Using the ‘republish’ button on our website is the easiest way to meet our guidelines.

Guidelines

You cannot edit the article.

When republishing, you have to credit our authors, ideally in the byline. You have to credit Particle with a link back to the original publication on Particle.

If you’re republishing online, you must use our pageview counter, link to us and include links from our story. Our page view counter is a small pixel-ping (invisible to the eye) that allows us to know when our content is republished. It’s a condition of our guidelines that you include our counter. If you use the ‘republish’ then you’ll capture our page counter.

If you’re republishing in print, please email us to let us so we know about it (we get very proud to see our work republished) and you must include the Particle logo next to the credits. Download logo here.

If you wish to republish all our stories, please contact us directly to discuss this opportunity.

Images

Most of the images used on Particle are copyright of the photographer who made them.

It is your responsibility to confirm that you’re licensed to republish images in our articles.

Video

All Particle videos can be accessed through YouTube under the Standard YouTube Licence.

The Standard YouTube licence

  1. This licence is ‘All Rights Reserved’, granting provisions for YouTube to display the content, and YouTube’s visitors to stream the content. This means that the content may be streamed from YouTube but specifically forbids downloading, adaptation, and redistribution, except where otherwise licensed. When uploading your content to YouTube it will automatically use the Standard YouTube licence. You can check this by clicking on Advanced Settings and looking at the dropdown box ‘License and rights ownership’.
  2. When a user is uploading a video he has license options that he can choose from. The first option is “standard YouTube License” which means that you grant the broadcasting rights to YouTube. This essentially means that your video can only be accessed from YouTube for watching purpose and cannot be reproduced or distributed in any other form without your consent.

Contact

For more information about using our content, email us: particle@scitech.org.au

Copy this HTML into your CMS
Press Ctrl+C to copy

We've got chemistry. Want something physical?