Get Regular Updates!
Search

Food

image|

Leo Nankervis/James Cook University

Fish farms and their feed problem

Fish farms and their feed problem

The world is eating more fish than ever, but we don't have more fish ...

Fish farms and their feed problem

Hankering for halibut? Tummy rumbles for tuna? Salivating for salmon?

The world is eating more fish than ever, while the amount of wild fish we catch has stayed roughly the same.

Fish farms, called aquaculture, are making up the gap between what we catch and what we eat. Now, over half the world’s fish supply is farmed.

But farmed fish come with their own problems. Farmed fish need to be fed, and some of this feed still comes from wild fish. About 70% of fish feed uses wild fish.

The percentage of wild fish in aquafeed is actually small. It makes up 7–8% of the aquafeed that includes it, but in an industry that deals in millions of tonnes of fish per year, this adds up quickly.

We will also need to make 37.4 million tonnes of aquafeed per year to meet the farming demand for the world population.

So how can we feed the fish that feed the world?

View Larger
Image|Leo Nankervis/James Cook Univeristy
Raw fish feed materials being blended together

Ingredients: beans, bovine, bass

Waste from animal, vegetable and even other fish farms could be a great source of future fish food.

“Fava beans and lupins are great. Farmers grow them because they fix nitrogen in the soil, then they’ll just mulch them because there’s no market outlet,” says Dr Leo Nankervis, aquaculture researcher at James Cook University.

“In aquafeed, they could be used for a productive reason.”

Leo says fish farms could also use the pulped remains of livestock and different fish species for extra protein.

But this relies on production of other animals and transport, often across states or even around the world.

View Larger
Image|Leo Nankervis/James Cook University
Leo farms jade perch for his research

DNAquaculture

Genetic modification could improve farm waste for fish. Algae is great at producing fatty acids.

Genetic modification could move those genes into rapeseed and canola.

“It’s an Australian technology, and it’s already well established in America. But our market is averse to genetically modified materials going into fish food,” says Leo.

So if fish farms used genetic modification, they might have trouble selling their stock.

Fly on the hook

One of the most likely possibilities is insect meal.

Nearly a third of food is wasted before it gets to the consumer. It typically goes to compost or landfill. We can feed those raw materials to insect larvae and get a high-protein feed,” says Leo.

It’s something we’re already testing in Western Australia.

“The DPIRD is working with the largest Australian-owned aquafeeds company [Ridley] and local insect manufacturers to test ingredients,” says Dr Gavin Partridge, research scientist at the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development.

McMicro meal

Bacteria would also be a great solution. They can turn waste products into nutrients like protein and vitamins better than plants.

One bacteria, Methylococcus capsulatus, is 1000 times more efficient than plants.

This light-eating purple bacteria can be grown in wastewater and indoors using infrared light.

It’s a great idea, but scaling up production risks other bacteria infecting the tanks.

So which way is best?

All of them are worth researching. Leo says that, because the global market is ever-changing, just relying on one method makes fish farmers vulnerable to shortages.

The more options available, the less we need to rely on wild fish to feed farmed fish.

You can help encourage sustainable fishing by buying products with the MSC blue fish tick label. To support responsibly farmed fish, go for the green ASC label.

Particle Puns

Republish

Creative Commons Logo

Republishing our content

We want our stories to be shared and seen by as many people as possible.

Therefore, unless it says otherwise, copyright on the stories on Particle belongs to Scitech and they are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This allows you to republish our articles online or in print for free. You just need to credit us and link to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately.

Using the ‘republish’ button on our website is the easiest way to meet our guidelines.

Guidelines

You cannot edit the article.

When republishing, you have to credit our authors, ideally in the byline. You have to credit Particle with a link back to the original publication on Particle.

If you’re republishing online, you must use our pageview counter, link to us and include links from our story. Our page view counter is a small pixel-ping (invisible to the eye) that allows us to know when our content is republished. It’s a condition of our guidelines that you include our counter. If you use the ‘republish’ then you’ll capture our page counter.

If you’re republishing in print, please email us to let us so we know about it (we get very proud to see our work republished) and you must include the Particle logo next to the credits. Download logo here.

If you wish to republish all our stories, please contact us directly to discuss this opportunity.

Images

Most of the images used on Particle are copyright of the photographer who made them.

It is your responsibility to confirm that you’re licensed to republish images in our articles.

Video

All Particle videos can be accessed through YouTube under the Standard YouTube Licence.

The Standard YouTube licence

  1. This licence is ‘All Rights Reserved’, granting provisions for YouTube to display the content, and YouTube’s visitors to stream the content. This means that the content may be streamed from YouTube but specifically forbids downloading, adaptation, and redistribution, except where otherwise licensed. When uploading your content to YouTube it will automatically use the Standard YouTube licence. You can check this by clicking on Advanced Settings and looking at the dropdown box ‘License and rights ownership’.
  2. When a user is uploading a video he has license options that he can choose from. The first option is “standard YouTube License” which means that you grant the broadcasting rights to YouTube. This essentially means that your video can only be accessed from YouTube for watching purpose and cannot be reproduced or distributed in any other form without your consent.

Contact

For more information about using our content, email us: particle@scitech.org.au

Copy this HTML into your CMS
Press Ctrl+C to copy

We've got chemistry. Want something physical?