READ

PROMISCUOUS GIRLS

Charles Darwin and Angus Bateman thought women and female animals weren’t promiscuous. They were wrong.
Cat Williams
Cat Williams
Freelance Writer
PROMISCUOUS GIRLS

For far too long, women have been seen as secondary to men under the patriarchal rule of human society.

Yet, humanity’s existence has been a minor blip in the history of the Earth, where females are the dominant sex of many species.

The differences between men and women are far greater culturally than biologically.

In animals like the noolbenger/honey possum, females are highly promiscuous, forcing males to evolve some impressive anatomical changes.

A MAN OF SCIENCE?

Charles Darwin’s work in natural selection was pivotal to our understanding of evolution.

But there were a few holes in his theory of sexual selection.

Sexual selection is an idea Darwin made up, which he says is the process in which animals compete with each other in order to reproduce.

Caption: Charles Darwin
Credit: via Biography.com

In making this prediction, Darwin deemed females ‘passive’. 

He cherry-picked data and skewed his results, deciding female animals were passive in the lives of their male counterparts.

Darwin insisted males were always in the business of wooing females, but females always submitted to males in sex and reproduction.

MAKE IT MAKE SENSE

Darwin determined that females couldn’t be promiscuous under any circumstances.

This is surprising, because he had evidence to the contrary.

In his 1871 book, The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, Darwin is told a story about a female goose who mated with two male geese of different phenotypes (meaning they looked very different).

The goose then hatched babies that were clearly sisters from different misters.

Despite this knowledge, Darwin continued to assert that females gained no benefit from promiscuity.

He clearly hadn’t encountered the female redback spider. She eats the male after mating – taking ‘dinner date’ to a whole new level.

A ‘TRAVESTY’

Darwin wasn’t the only scientist who thought females couldn’t be promiscuous. Angus John Bateman had very similar ideas.

Bateman conducted a series of experiments on fruit flies that were very poorly designed.

He concluded female fruit flies received no benefit from being promiscuous, but males were better off if they mated with many females.

Caption: Bateman tested his ‘theory’ on fruit flies, such as this one.
Credit: Shutterstock

Bateman applied this idea to every animal in the animal kingdom, including humans.

Patricia Gowaty, a professor in evolutionary biology, dug up Bateman’s lab notes and recreated his experiment. She found Bateman’s experiment was full of flaws. 

Most notably, Bateman counted fathers as parents more often than he counted mothers as parents, which is impossible given you need both to reproduce.

In fact, Gowaty called Bateman’s experiment a ‘travesty’.

FLAWED RESULTS

Bateman also failed to realise a quarter of the fruit flies would die from the mutations inherited from its parents, influencing his results.

In Gowaty’s version of his experiment, female fruit flies benefited from being promiscuous and mating with multiple males, although to a lesser degree than males.

Bateman chose results that matched his expectations and fit nicely with Darwin’s idea of passive females and promiscuous males.

This was a nasty case of confirmation bias.

A SLIPPERY SLOPE

The idea that males benefit from multiple matings and females don’t is known as ‘Bateman’s Gradient’.

Caption: Bateman’s Gradient showing that females do not benefit from multiple matings, whereas males do.
Credit: Edward Morrow, 2015

Bateman believed promiscuity would only benefit males because of a phenomenon called anisogamy.

Anisogamy is the distinct difference in gamete size many animals – including humans – have.

Gametes are sex cells, like sperm and eggs in humans. Human sperm are very small compared to eggs.

This was the sole premise Bateman relied on to conclude that because males can be foolish with their DNA, they benefit from promiscuity but females don’t.

STAY CALM AND THINK OF ENGLAND?

British ornithologist and Emeritus Professor of Behavioural Ecology Tim Birkhead outlines this sentiment in his book, Promiscuity: An evolutionary history of sperm evolution.

“If the number of males and females are approximately equal, how can most males copulate with many females and most females copulate with only one male?” says Tim.

“The presumed answer was that … females did copulate with more than one male but reluctantly.”

“On being approached by another [male], they lay back and thought of England, but their hearts weren’t in it.”

However, Birkhead and I both know this was not the case. Those ladies were thinking of anything but England.

ALL SWEET FOR THE HONEY POSSUM

Although Bateman is long dead, his gradient is still in textbooks and the idea that females are passive, choosy and not promiscuous is still taught in biology classrooms.

However, there are plenty of promiscuous female animals.

The honey possum (Tarsipes rostratus) is highly sexually promiscuous. They are classified as polyandrous, which means one female mates with multiple males.

Endemic to WA’s southwest and known by Noongar people as noolbenger, these animals are about the size of your thumb.

Each honey possum litter has two to four young, although no more than three will survive.

Caption: A honey possum on a banksia plant.
Credit: Simon Colenutt via iNaturalist (CC BY 4.0)

Although these young are born at the same time, they may only be half siblings. When honey possums mate with multiple males, their litters could have multiple fathers.

While most litters are sired by two males, it’s possible for three young born at the same time to have three different fathers.

The female honey possum doesn’t know which male is the father to her babies, like a Discovery Channel’s Bridget Jones’ Baby.

MELON BALLS

In species where the female is more sexually promiscuous, males have to engage in sperm competition in the hopes their genetic material is passed onto the next generation.

The bigger the sperm and more of it, the better chance a male has of being a father.

To help their cause, males of species with promiscuous females have evolved large testicles.

Male noolbenger’s testicles make up 4% of their body weight. That’s like an average-sized human male having testicles the size of rockmelons.

Caption: A honey possum on a banksia plant.
Credit: Simon Colenutt via iNaturalist (CC BY 4.0)

Male honey possums also have the largest sperm of any mammal.

This is despite having the smallest young, the size of a grain of rice.

Research suggests females who are promiscuous have a greater likelihood of reproductive success, because they gain genetic material from different males.

They can then pass the diverse genes onto their offspring and potentially gain greater access to resources.

Honey possums aren’t alone in their promiscuity. Antechinus’, echidnas, dolphins, bees, crickets, frogs and 90 percent of bird species are all highly promiscuous.

Imagine a world in which all human females were mating with multiple males, men might start evolving rockmelon-sized testicles.

Cat Williams
About the author
Cat Williams
Cat is a science communicator with a background in zoology and conservation biology. Most of her work has been spent setting her hand on fire for people’s entertainment or travelling to remote communities. Cat is now a freelance science writer, enjoys travelling, and patting every single dog that enters her periphery.
View articles
Cat is a science communicator with a background in zoology and conservation biology. Most of her work has been spent setting her hand on fire for people’s entertainment or travelling to remote communities. Cat is now a freelance science writer, enjoys travelling, and patting every single dog that enters her periphery.
View articles

NEXT ARTICLE

We've got chemistry, let's take it to the next level!

Get the latest WA science news delivered to your inbox, every fortnight.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Republish

Creative Commons Logo

Republishing our content

We want our stories to be shared and seen by as many people as possible.

Therefore, unless it says otherwise, copyright on the stories on Particle belongs to Scitech and they are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This allows you to republish our articles online or in print for free. You just need to credit us and link to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately.

Using the ‘republish’ button on our website is the easiest way to meet our guidelines.

Guidelines

You cannot edit the article.

When republishing, you have to credit our authors, ideally in the byline. You have to credit Particle with a link back to the original publication on Particle.

If you’re republishing online, you must use our pageview counter, link to us and include links from our story. Our page view counter is a small pixel-ping (invisible to the eye) that allows us to know when our content is republished. It’s a condition of our guidelines that you include our counter. If you use the ‘republish’ then you’ll capture our page counter.

If you’re republishing in print, please email us to let us so we know about it (we get very proud to see our work republished) and you must include the Particle logo next to the credits. Download logo here.

If you wish to republish all our stories, please contact us directly to discuss this opportunity.

Images

Most of the images used on Particle are copyright of the photographer who made them.

It is your responsibility to confirm that you’re licensed to republish images in our articles.

Video

All Particle videos can be accessed through YouTube under the Standard YouTube Licence.

The Standard YouTube licence

  1. This licence is ‘All Rights Reserved’, granting provisions for YouTube to display the content, and YouTube’s visitors to stream the content. This means that the content may be streamed from YouTube but specifically forbids downloading, adaptation, and redistribution, except where otherwise licensed. When uploading your content to YouTube it will automatically use the Standard YouTube licence. You can check this by clicking on Advanced Settings and looking at the dropdown box ‘License and rights ownership’.
  2. When a user is uploading a video he has license options that he can choose from. The first option is “standard YouTube License” which means that you grant the broadcasting rights to YouTube. This essentially means that your video can only be accessed from YouTube for watching purpose and cannot be reproduced or distributed in any other form without your consent.

Contact

For more information about using our content, email us: particle@scitech.org.au

Copy this HTML into your CMS
Press Ctrl+C to copy