READ

FOGO: Friend or Foe?

Waste recycling systems should help change behaviours, not enable bad habits.
Tom Gurn
Tom Gurn
Freelance Writer
FOGO: Friend or Foe?

We’re in the midst of a global waste crisis.

From the ‘Great’ Pacific Garbage Patch to the microplastics seasoning your cereal, the rubbish we ‘throw away’ seems to crop back up almost everywhere you look.

Food Organics and Garden Organics, also known as FOGO, is a government initiative aimed at tackling the waste crisis.

FOGO is based on the idea that sorting our waste is easiest at the top of the chain: our kitchens.

Is this subtle change to a weekly chore really the solution to a pressing global issue?

WASTE NOT, WANT NOT

Humans have been thinking about where to dump their rubbish since time began.

Landfills date back to 3000 BC. Mounds of human byproducts – called middens – may be as ancient as 130,000 years ago.

Everything changed in the 20th century. Enter plastic. This highly useful material doesn’t decompose. It just breaks down into tinier and tinier pieces until it becomes inorganic microplastic dust, like hyper-coloured sand. 


Caption: Microplastics have been found from the top of Everest to the bottom of the Mariana Trench
Credit: OceanBlueProject, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Australian households were responsible for 12.4 million tonnes of waste in 2019, of which around 10% was plastic. 

Each of us generates over 300 kilos in wasted food a year

Even after we die, high-level nuclear waste is stored deep underground in facilities designed to deter interaction for the 100,000 years it will remain radioactive.

THE CRUST OF THE ISSUE

Lauren Goodheart is a Resource Recovery Specialist at Australia’s leading waste management company Cleanaway.

She says population growth has significantly influenced the issue. 

“As the population grows and urbanisation increases, consumption patterns shift,” says Lauren.

“People are buying more packaged goods, eating more processed foods and creating more waste – driven by busy schedules, convenience-oriented food choices and a throwaway culture.”

The responsibility doesn’t lie solely with the consumer though. Governments and corporations have plenty to answer for.

“Brands are always promoting new food products to consumers and output these products at high volumes, which doesn’t always equate to the consumer demand,” says Lauren.

“They then expire and go to landfill.”


Caption: Australia produces 7.6 million tonnes of food waste a year
Credit: petrr, CC BY 2.0 via Wikimedia Commons

IS FOGO A NOGO?

As the walls of rubbish continue to build around us, scientists have a few hopeful solutions. 

In China, one of the world’s leading waste producers, researchers are emphasising an approach called co-production. 

Co-production means the issue must be tackled culturally at all levels – from the consumers at the bottom, through the supply chain, to the institutions at the top. Everyone is involved and responsible. 

“Waste recycling systems should help change behaviours, not enable bad habits,” says Lauren.

“If we rely solely on recycling while continuing to overconsume and dispose of materials carelessly, we’re missing the bigger picture – waste avoidance.”

She says waste education and awareness are critical, as well as campaigns like The Great Unwaste and OzHarvest

The Great Unwaste initiative aims to shift the mindset from waste disposal to resource recovery, encouraging people to rethink what they throw away and find ways to reuse, repair and recycle correctly. 

“The goal is to turn waste into opportunity, ensuring valuable materials don’t end up in landfill,” says Lauren. 

IF IT GROWS, IT GOES

Lauren says that, even when being mindful of minimising food waste, there will be leftover scraps.

“Instead of sending scraps to landfill, FOGO ensures they’re put to good use,” says Lauren.

When dumped at the tip, FOGO waste releases dangerous amounts of methane.

“By recovering food and garden waste, we can transform it into nutrient-rich compost that enriches our soil rather than contributing to harmful methane emissions,” says Lauren. 

While innovation is valuable in effective waste management, we need to prioritise prevention – addressing the root cause rather than finding new ways to deal with the consequences.


Caption: The waste hierarchy is a useful tool
Credit: New Zealand Trade and Enterprise, CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons

“By embracing FOGO and having a ‘reduce waste’ mindset, we create a system where waste isn’t discarded – it’s given a new life,” says Lauren.

INNOVATE, ADAPT, OVERCOME?

Labs around the world are developing new technologies to deal with waste – from fungus that can eat plastic for lunch to bacterial enzymes that digest microplastics

Some argue AI can save the day. Others, like our CSIRO, are creating compostable plastic, transforming waste into a valuable commodity.  

But how far can innovation take us when we continue to consume at current rates?

“Refuse and reduce should be our first focus,” says Lauren.

“Reusing and repurposing then come into play.

“Ultimately, innovation should support reduction, not just better ways of managing waste. 

“If we only focus on the latter, we risk treating the symptoms while allowing the problem – overconsumption – to persist unchecked.”

Tom Gurn
About the author
Tom Gurn
Tom Gurn is a freelance writer from Kaurna Yerta (Adelaide), South Australia
View articles
Tom Gurn is a freelance writer from Kaurna Yerta (Adelaide), South Australia
View articles

NEXT ARTICLE

We've got chemistry, let's take it to the next level!

Get the latest WA science news delivered to your inbox, every fortnight.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Republish

Creative Commons Logo

Republishing our content

We want our stories to be shared and seen by as many people as possible.

Therefore, unless it says otherwise, copyright on the stories on Particle belongs to Scitech and they are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This allows you to republish our articles online or in print for free. You just need to credit us and link to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately.

Using the ‘republish’ button on our website is the easiest way to meet our guidelines.

Guidelines

You cannot edit the article.

When republishing, you have to credit our authors, ideally in the byline. You have to credit Particle with a link back to the original publication on Particle.

If you’re republishing online, you must use our pageview counter, link to us and include links from our story. Our page view counter is a small pixel-ping (invisible to the eye) that allows us to know when our content is republished. It’s a condition of our guidelines that you include our counter. If you use the ‘republish’ then you’ll capture our page counter.

If you’re republishing in print, please email us to let us so we know about it (we get very proud to see our work republished) and you must include the Particle logo next to the credits. Download logo here.

If you wish to republish all our stories, please contact us directly to discuss this opportunity.

Images

Most of the images used on Particle are copyright of the photographer who made them.

It is your responsibility to confirm that you’re licensed to republish images in our articles.

Video

All Particle videos can be accessed through YouTube under the Standard YouTube Licence.

The Standard YouTube licence

  1. This licence is ‘All Rights Reserved’, granting provisions for YouTube to display the content, and YouTube’s visitors to stream the content. This means that the content may be streamed from YouTube but specifically forbids downloading, adaptation, and redistribution, except where otherwise licensed. When uploading your content to YouTube it will automatically use the Standard YouTube licence. You can check this by clicking on Advanced Settings and looking at the dropdown box ‘License and rights ownership’.
  2. When a user is uploading a video he has license options that he can choose from. The first option is “standard YouTube License” which means that you grant the broadcasting rights to YouTube. This essentially means that your video can only be accessed from YouTube for watching purpose and cannot be reproduced or distributed in any other form without your consent.

Contact

For more information about using our content, email us: particle@scitech.org.au

Copy this HTML into your CMS
Press Ctrl+C to copy