READ

The Path to Mars: Small Unsexy Problems

It’s 2046 and blue sky fades to black as your rocket blasts into space.
Keelan Powell
Keelan Powell
Science Communicator
The Path to Mars: Small Unsexy Problems

This article is a speculative piece based on the European Space Agency (ESA) Strategy 2040 plan for the future of space exploration. Dr Orson Sutherland, a program manager responsible for Mars exploration at ESA, shared his expertise and work on multiple ongoing projects.

Orson stresses that, in Mars exploration, “There’s ambition and then there’s reality.”

There are many technical, physiological and psychological challenges to overcome and safety risks to minimise before a manned mission to Mars is possible.

“We have to do it in a way which is responsible,” says Orson. “Even if there are people out there brave enough to take the risk.”

Not So Small Problems

It’s 2046 and blue sky fades to black as your rocket blasts into space.

You release a sigh of relief when the ship’s diagnostics report optimal radiator function. There’s no convection or conduction in space – if your radiators fail, you boil. It’s one of those small problems most people don’t think about.

“There are so many small problems that don’t seem sexy enough when you think about trying to land a big rocket on the surface,” says Orson.

Radiation, dust, biological threats. Those ‘small problems’ are your responsibilities. The media mockingly calls you the Little Things Lead. Among the other astronauts, though, your position is revered.

Caption: Dr Orson Sutherland, ESA program manager for Mars exploration.
Credit: Supplied Orson Sutherland

Paving the Way

Your commander jokes about the headlines accompanied by images of colonies made of domes and hallways. As if you could afford to bring a whole building.

Your base has to be underground. 

“At about 1.5 metres depth, you get effective full protection, full shielding,” says Orson. Shielding from the deadly solar radiation the Martian atmosphere is too thin to filter out.

You’re reminded of Rosalind Franklin, the first rover to drill that deep on the surface of Mars. Launched in 2028, it helped pave the way for this mission. The results from the Mars Organic Molecule Analyser (MOMA) were particularly fascinating.

MOMA was designed to analyse samples from beneath the surface for organic molecules. If there is any life on Mars, that’s likely where it will be.

NASA-ESA Mars Sample Return was equally pivotal. Bringing samples to Earth for analysis proved a round trip was possible.

Caption: A rendering of the Rosalind Franklin rover, named after British chemist Rosalind Franklin.
Credit: ESA/Mlabspace, 2020. ESA Standard Licence.

Clashing Ambitions

Your crew fixate on minor course corrections. Mars is a small moving target in a big Solar System. 

Missions can only be launched in one short window every 26 months. It is critical that everything goes to plan. If your mission fails, the next opportunity won’t be until 2048.

You recall a number of failed SpaceX launches in 2025 that delayed the company’s efforts to send a humanoid robot to Mars. Mars missions are impossible if you can’t first demonstrate the necessary technology.

This mission is one such demonstration for the next. Although next time, there’s no certainty that all the clashing ambitions will be able to compromise again.

“There is a synergy between colonial ambitions and scientific curiosity. I think we just need to make sure we do it in a way that both views are respected and it’s in the best interests of all humanity,” says Orson.

“I can’t believe that we would colonise and not want to understand.” 

That’s the sentiment that led to this mission.

While some want to colonise and others want to understand, most fall somewhere between. 

The desire to discover the origins and evolution of the Solar System tempers even the biggest egos.

Science All the Way Down

The geology of Mars, which once had liquid water, will reveal many of the secrets of that evolution. There’s a buzz of excitement among the crew about what you might discover on the surface of the Red Planet.

The science has already begun. You’ll be participating in various experiments testing the effects of prolonged space flight throughout the 9-month voyage to Mars.

That’s a long time to contemplate your hopes for this mission.

“I have no doubt we will achieve [colonies on Mars],” says Orson. “That is not the question. The question is when and under what circumstances.”

What are your circumstances? Do you want to own or learn?

Regardless of ideals among the crew, you all agree on two essentials of the mission.

Caption: Mars once had significant amounts of water on it.
Credit: NASA/JPL/MSSS

Bureaucracy in Space

First and foremost, respect the COSPAR rules. Minimise your footprint on Mars to prevent environmental contamination. 

Respecting COSPAR means keeping track of everything you come into contact with to ensure you maintain Earth’s biological integrity when you return.

“I think we as Europeans want to ensure that we can maintain a pristine environment where we’re going,” says Orson. “Whether that’s Mars … [or] whether that’s anywhere else in the Solar System or beyond.”

Your biggest challenge will be the second essential. 

“You’re going to need to be able to get the resources in situ to survive and to come back,” says Orson. 

That means water, nutrients and building materials need to come from Mars.

Some in your crew see in situ resource utilisation as a fascinating experiment. Others see it as a thrilling challenge.

To enhance humanity’s understanding of Mars and its potential to support ancient life and future colonies, you’re all ready to work together.

Keelan Powell
About the author
Keelan Powell
Keelan is a science communicator and an author of science fiction and fantasy. He has a background in physics, creative writing, literary theory, and science communication. Keelan enjoys bringing science to art and art to science and thrives in the beautiful chaos that always ensues when the two fields mix.
View articles
Keelan is a science communicator and an author of science fiction and fantasy. He has a background in physics, creative writing, literary theory, and science communication. Keelan enjoys bringing science to art and art to science and thrives in the beautiful chaos that always ensues when the two fields mix.
View articles

NEXT ARTICLE

We've got chemistry, let's take it to the next level!

Get the latest WA science news delivered to your inbox, every fortnight.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Republish

Creative Commons Logo

Republishing our content

We want our stories to be shared and seen by as many people as possible.

Therefore, unless it says otherwise, copyright on the stories on Particle belongs to Scitech and they are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This allows you to republish our articles online or in print for free. You just need to credit us and link to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately.

Using the ‘republish’ button on our website is the easiest way to meet our guidelines.

Guidelines

You cannot edit the article.

When republishing, you have to credit our authors, ideally in the byline. You have to credit Particle with a link back to the original publication on Particle.

If you’re republishing online, you must use our pageview counter, link to us and include links from our story. Our page view counter is a small pixel-ping (invisible to the eye) that allows us to know when our content is republished. It’s a condition of our guidelines that you include our counter. If you use the ‘republish’ then you’ll capture our page counter.

If you’re republishing in print, please email us to let us so we know about it (we get very proud to see our work republished) and you must include the Particle logo next to the credits. Download logo here.

If you wish to republish all our stories, please contact us directly to discuss this opportunity.

Images

Most of the images used on Particle are copyright of the photographer who made them.

It is your responsibility to confirm that you’re licensed to republish images in our articles.

Video

All Particle videos can be accessed through YouTube under the Standard YouTube Licence.

The Standard YouTube licence

  1. This licence is ‘All Rights Reserved’, granting provisions for YouTube to display the content, and YouTube’s visitors to stream the content. This means that the content may be streamed from YouTube but specifically forbids downloading, adaptation, and redistribution, except where otherwise licensed. When uploading your content to YouTube it will automatically use the Standard YouTube licence. You can check this by clicking on Advanced Settings and looking at the dropdown box ‘License and rights ownership’.
  2. When a user is uploading a video he has license options that he can choose from. The first option is “standard YouTube License” which means that you grant the broadcasting rights to YouTube. This essentially means that your video can only be accessed from YouTube for watching purpose and cannot be reproduced or distributed in any other form without your consent.

Contact

For more information about using our content, email us: particle@scitech.org.au

Copy this HTML into your CMS
Press Ctrl+C to copy