READ

PARTICLE 101: GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD

What does a genetically modified tomato reveal about food technology in Australia?
Kate Holmes
Kate Holmes
Freelance Writer
PARTICLE 101: GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD

Editor’s note: The purple tomatoes in the above image are not the Purple Tomato product. The image has been edited to make regular tomatoes appear purple.


Humans have modified crops and animals for thousands of years. Long before laboratories, we selectively bred species for size, sweetness, colour and yield. 

Vegetables like broccoli, cabbage and kale all come from a single type of wild mustard, created through selective breeding over generations.

Carrots were changed from purple and yellow to orange, showing nationalistic pride in 17th century Netherlands. 

Genetic modification technologies accelerated something humans have always done with our food sources.

Western Australia declared itself a genetically modified (GM) crop-free zone in 2004, but this was gradually overturned between 2010 and 2016

Caption: Crops like canola are genetically modified to be herbicide resistant and were approved for planting in WA in 2010.
Credit: Kate Holmes

GM crops like canola and cotton are engineered to be herbicide tolerant or resistant to insects. This is a huge benefit to farmers, but these benefits usually go unseen for consumers.

The Australian approval of a GM tomato flips that focus from farmer to fork-holder.

IT AIN’T EASY BEING … PURPLE?

The Purple Tomato – a GM cherry tomato – is set to hit Australian supermarket shelves and garden centres in late 2026. 

It will be the first commercially available genetically modified fresh food for sale in Australia.

Tomatoes naturally make tiny amounts of anthocyanins – the pigments that give blueberries and red cabbage their colour. 

Normally, a tomato’s genes tell it to switch off anthocyanin production before ripening. But in the Purple Tomato, scientists introduced two genes from snapdragon flowers that switched on higher levels of anthocyanin production. 

This caused the tomato to express a vibrant, deep purple colour in the skin and flesh.

“[These] tomatoes are an exciting food innovation … with enhanced health properties,” says Professor Phil Brewer from La Trobe University.

“They are safe to eat. In fact, getting more anthocyanins in our diet is healthy.”

While aesthetic, why go to the effort of making a purple tomato? Will the colour be enough for consumers to try them? Or will they be just another passing novelty?

Caption: Tomato developer Cathie Martin at her laboratory at John Innes Centre in 2010
Credit: © Daniel Tan

TASTY, SOCIAL, SCIENCE

Food is social, not just scientific, says Dr Heather Bray at the University of Western Australia.

Cost, allergies, convenience, cultural and social values are additional factors beyond safety for food consumer decisions around food.

And importantly, food is meant to taste good!

When it comes to the Purple Tomato, Heather says, “While safety is the most important concern when it comes to food, whether consumers find it tasty is the ultimate test for this new product.”

“There’s no scientific reason for birthday cake, but that doesn’t mean I want to live in a world without it.”

 

Kate Holmes
About the author
Kate Holmes
Kate is a former West Aussie farm kid, linguist and speech pathologist. A jack of all trades, she’s worked with everyone from medical students to radio astronomers, and appreciates the beauty of a well crafted spreadsheet. She still wants to be Ms Frizzle and Simone Giertz when she grows up.
View articles
Kate is a former West Aussie farm kid, linguist and speech pathologist. A jack of all trades, she’s worked with everyone from medical students to radio astronomers, and appreciates the beauty of a well crafted spreadsheet. She still wants to be Ms Frizzle and Simone Giertz when she grows up.
View articles

NEXT ARTICLE

We've got chemistry, let's take it to the next level!

Get the latest WA science news delivered to your inbox, every fortnight.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Republish

Creative Commons Logo

Republishing our content

We want our stories to be shared and seen by as many people as possible.

Therefore, unless it says otherwise, copyright on the stories on Particle belongs to Scitech and they are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This allows you to republish our articles online or in print for free. You just need to credit us and link to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately.

Using the ‘republish’ button on our website is the easiest way to meet our guidelines.

Guidelines

You cannot edit the article.

When republishing, you have to credit our authors, ideally in the byline. You have to credit Particle with a link back to the original publication on Particle.

If you’re republishing online, you must use our pageview counter, link to us and include links from our story. Our page view counter is a small pixel-ping (invisible to the eye) that allows us to know when our content is republished. It’s a condition of our guidelines that you include our counter. If you use the ‘republish’ then you’ll capture our page counter.

If you’re republishing in print, please email us to let us so we know about it (we get very proud to see our work republished) and you must include the Particle logo next to the credits. Download logo here.

If you wish to republish all our stories, please contact us directly to discuss this opportunity.

Images

Most of the images used on Particle are copyright of the photographer who made them.

It is your responsibility to confirm that you’re licensed to republish images in our articles.

Video

All Particle videos can be accessed through YouTube under the Standard YouTube Licence.

The Standard YouTube licence

  1. This licence is ‘All Rights Reserved’, granting provisions for YouTube to display the content, and YouTube’s visitors to stream the content. This means that the content may be streamed from YouTube but specifically forbids downloading, adaptation, and redistribution, except where otherwise licensed. When uploading your content to YouTube it will automatically use the Standard YouTube licence. You can check this by clicking on Advanced Settings and looking at the dropdown box ‘License and rights ownership’.
  2. When a user is uploading a video he has license options that he can choose from. The first option is “standard YouTube License” which means that you grant the broadcasting rights to YouTube. This essentially means that your video can only be accessed from YouTube for watching purpose and cannot be reproduced or distributed in any other form without your consent.

Contact

For more information about using our content, email us: particle@scitech.org.au

Copy this HTML into your CMS
Press Ctrl+C to copy