READ

The world’s oldest impact crater could be in our backyard

A meteorite slammed into WA billions of years ago. Or did it?
Kate Holmes
Kate Holmes
Freelance Writer
The world’s oldest impact crater could be in our backyard

In the beginning, Earth was a violent place with no atmosphere to soften the blow.

About 66 million years ago, an asteroid slammed into what is now Mexico, forming the Chicxulub crater.

This impact wiped out the dinosaurs and around 75% of all species on Earth at the time.

But another crater, located in Australia, is far older. Billions of years older.

According to research from Curtin University, this site could be the oldest meteorite impact crater ever discovered on Earth.

How old is the oldest meteorite impact crater on the planet? 3.5 billion years old.

And it’s right here in WA, deep in the Pilbara.

MADE IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA

Scientists examined rocks at North Pole Dome, 40 kilometres west of Marble Bar. 

The area is home to some of Earth’s earliest preserved crust.

​​The team found signs of shock textures and microscopic patterns in the rock caused by intense heat and pressure. 

The kind only a massive cosmic impact could create.

“Before our discovery, the oldest impact crater was 2.2 billion years old, so this is by far the oldest known crater ever found on Earth,” says Professor Tim Johnson.

Caption: Shatter cones are unique cone-shaped cracks that can only form after a meteorite impact. 
Credit: Curtin University Media

HIT ME SPACE ROCK, ONE MORE TIME

Shatter cones, distinctive rock formations that only form under the extreme pressure of a meteorite strike, revealed what happened.

A meteor hit the region at more than 36,000 kilometres per hour, creating a crater more than 100 kilometres wide and launching debris across the world. 

The impact reshaped the landscape, and possibly the planet.

This discovery means Earth was pummelled by meteorites far earlier than previously thought. 

This has major implications for the origin of life, atmosphere formation and early plate tectonics.

ALL THE WORLD’S A STAGE

It’s not every day Western Australia rewrites Earth’s history. But not everyone sees it the same way.

In July 2025, a team of geologists from Harvard published new research suggesting the impact might have been smaller and more recent than first thought. 

Their fieldwork and analysis estimates the strike happened around 2.7 billion years ago and left behind a crater about 16 kilometres wide. 

So who’s right?

SCIENCE IN THE MAKING

Two different answers isn’t a failure or a controversy. It’s science working as it should.

Disagreement is part of the process. Researchers are expected to question each other’s findings, build on them and test them again. 

It’s not about who says it, but whether the evidence holds up. The system of science is built to evolve, much like the story of our planet.

Caption: Scientific norms are guidelines that science sticks to – and why the process of peer review, or organised scepticism, is so important when advancing scientific knowledge.
Credit: Kate Holmes/Napkin AI

THE STORY OF US

After all, the Chicxulub crater was only confirmed as the source of the dinosaur mass extinction in 1991. The idea – once controversial – is now widely accepted by the scientific community. 

Whether this meteorite impact occurred 3.5 billion years ago or far more recently, one thing is clear: we are still piecing together the story of our planet. 

Every new discovery, disagreement or discussion takes us one step closer.

Kate Holmes
About the author
Kate Holmes
Kate is a former West Aussie farm kid, linguist and speech pathologist. A jack of all trades, she’s worked with everyone from medical students to radio astronomers, and appreciates the beauty of a well crafted spreadsheet. She still wants to be Ms Frizzle and Simone Giertz when she grows up.
View articles
Kate is a former West Aussie farm kid, linguist and speech pathologist. A jack of all trades, she’s worked with everyone from medical students to radio astronomers, and appreciates the beauty of a well crafted spreadsheet. She still wants to be Ms Frizzle and Simone Giertz when she grows up.
View articles

NEXT ARTICLE

We've got chemistry, let's take it to the next level!

Get the latest WA science news delivered to your inbox, every fortnight.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Republish

Creative Commons Logo

Republishing our content

We want our stories to be shared and seen by as many people as possible.

Therefore, unless it says otherwise, copyright on the stories on Particle belongs to Scitech and they are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This allows you to republish our articles online or in print for free. You just need to credit us and link to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately.

Using the ‘republish’ button on our website is the easiest way to meet our guidelines.

Guidelines

You cannot edit the article.

When republishing, you have to credit our authors, ideally in the byline. You have to credit Particle with a link back to the original publication on Particle.

If you’re republishing online, you must use our pageview counter, link to us and include links from our story. Our page view counter is a small pixel-ping (invisible to the eye) that allows us to know when our content is republished. It’s a condition of our guidelines that you include our counter. If you use the ‘republish’ then you’ll capture our page counter.

If you’re republishing in print, please email us to let us so we know about it (we get very proud to see our work republished) and you must include the Particle logo next to the credits. Download logo here.

If you wish to republish all our stories, please contact us directly to discuss this opportunity.

Images

Most of the images used on Particle are copyright of the photographer who made them.

It is your responsibility to confirm that you’re licensed to republish images in our articles.

Video

All Particle videos can be accessed through YouTube under the Standard YouTube Licence.

The Standard YouTube licence

  1. This licence is ‘All Rights Reserved’, granting provisions for YouTube to display the content, and YouTube’s visitors to stream the content. This means that the content may be streamed from YouTube but specifically forbids downloading, adaptation, and redistribution, except where otherwise licensed. When uploading your content to YouTube it will automatically use the Standard YouTube licence. You can check this by clicking on Advanced Settings and looking at the dropdown box ‘License and rights ownership’.
  2. When a user is uploading a video he has license options that he can choose from. The first option is “standard YouTube License” which means that you grant the broadcasting rights to YouTube. This essentially means that your video can only be accessed from YouTube for watching purpose and cannot be reproduced or distributed in any other form without your consent.

Contact

For more information about using our content, email us: particle@scitech.org.au

Copy this HTML into your CMS
Press Ctrl+C to copy