READ

Salmon farming: The good, the bad and the ugly

Should we be eating farmed salmon?
Jackson Ryan
Jackson Ryan
Freelance Writer
Salmon farming: The good, the bad and the ugly

Bodies piled up against the edge of the pen, skin flaking off, pink flesh to the sky. From above, a glut of dead fish ripples in time with the waves. 

This is the scene of a marine horror film – each body an expired Atlantic salmon.

It was filmed in Tasmania’s D’Entrecasteaux Channel by the Bob Brown Foundation, an environmental advocacy group. 

It’s here that salmon are enclosed within gigantic steel pens – farms for major aquaculture corporations Tassal and Huon.

“We put the drone up and we just came across pens with hundreds and hundreds of fish floating on the top,” says Alistair Allan, an Antarctic and marine campaigner with the Foundation. 

“There were just dead fish everywhere.”

The dead salmon had fallen to a bacterial infection that spread like wildfire through the population. An estimated 8% of the industry’s annual production died within weeks. 

The impact of the deaths reached all the way to shore, with chunks of salmon fat washing up on nearby beaches. 

The uncomfortable scenes, just ahead of an election, were met with anger and grief by advocacy groups and concern from the salmon industry. 

“We will of course be reviewing every element of this event and will make changes to protect our fish, our environment, our workers and our communities into the future,” said industry body Salmon Tasmania in a fact sheet in response to questions from Particle.

And it put salmon farming, which has exploded in size and scale in Tasmania since it began in the 1980s, back in the spotlight.

Caption: A farmed salmon with an injury.
Credit: Abolish Salmon Farming

BIG FARMER

Humans have been catching and eating fish for thousands of years, but it’s around the last 60 years where we’ve been farming salmonids at scale. Salmonids, which include Atlantic and Pacific salmon and rainbow trout, are among the most farmed fish species on Earth. 

Salmon start their life in freshwater streams as tiny spawn, then migrate to the open ocean about a year into their life. 

They spend the next 3–5 years maturing at sea, before returning to the place they were born to reproduce. (Most die because the journey home is taxing – swimming upstream for miles and dodging grizzly bears.)

Salmon are farmed in a way that attempts to mimic this cycle. The young are reared in huge on-land facilities, from plastic trays to giant tanks, where they grow until they’re ready to be transported to pens in the open ocean. 

Caption: Salmon pen in the open ocean with seals resting on the barrier.
Credit: Wilderness Witness

They grow in these pens until they are ready to be harvested – a process that can take a few years. 

It’s here, exposed to seawater and in constant exchange with the natural environment, where salmon farming has its greatest impacts.

SOMETHING IS FISHY 

Wild Atlantic salmon are native to the Atlantic Ocean. No wild populations exist in Tasmania. 

But in Norway, where salmon farming originated, locals have been fishing for salmon for hundreds of years. And farming could jeopardise the wild population.

“Salmon farming is the biggest threat to wild salmon in Norway, in addition to climate change,” says Eva Thorstad, a salmonid biologist at the Norwegian Institute for Nature Research.

Farmed salmon live in high densities, where there can be more issues with disease. If a farmed fish has sea lice and a wild fish swims past, disease or parasites could be spread. 

Interbreeding can also be a problem. “Wild salmon are adapted to one river,” says Eva. 

She explains that, if salmon escape, there’s a possibility they breed with wild salmon, which alters the genetic diversity, and adaptations to individual rivers may be lost. 

In Tasmania’s Macquarie Harbour, research suggests salmon farming has contributed to lower oxygen levels in the water. The harbour is also the only remaining habitat for the Maugean skate, a critically endangered ray, and salmon farming jeopardises its existence. 

FACTORIES OR FARMS

Overfishing has led to declines in many fish species. As the demand for seafood rose, so did the desire to implement farming and aquaculture. Since 2013, seafood production has been dominated by those methods.

The seafood industry is massive. It’s worth almost $400 billion per year. 

Salmon – particularly Atlantic salmon – is big business, and the fish are farmed in places like Norway, Chile, Canada, the UK and Tasmania. 

According to the Department of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania, Tasmanian salmon aquaculture is an important contributor to the state’s economy and to the overall Australian seafood market.  

Caption: A cramped salmon pen in Tasmania.
Credit: Bob Brown Foundation

The Department also suggests the state supplies over 90% of Australian Atlantic salmon production, valuing the industry’s output at over $1 billion.

It’s at this intersection of industry and environment where conflict often arises.

As salmon farmers have scaled up production, environmental groups have also rallied against fish farming, which was once seen as a greener alternative to catching wild fish.

Alistair from the Bob Brown Foundation likens the scale of salmon farming in Tasmania to “factory farms out on the water”. 

He’s concerned that aquaculture and farming have been touted as a fix for overfishing, but in reality, they’re doing severe damage to marine ecosystems. 

SHOULD WE EAT FARMED SALMON?

If you’re a fan of sushi and sashimi, all of this might have you questioning your salmon intake.

First, some good news: The recent bacterial outbreak in Tasmania is not a risk to humans. The Department states, “P. salmonis is a fish pathogen and does not cause human or terrestrial animal disease, or any food safety risk.”

But farmed Atlantic salmon does account for the vast majority of salmon that reaches consumers’ plates, so it’s likely your sake maki has come from a farm. 

That might not be a bad thing, depending on where the salmon comes from.

Norwegian farmed salmon is one of the most sustainable animal protein sources around, according to the Norwegian Seafood Council. The gains in sustainability have largely been driven by technological innovations and improving the supply chain.

Caption: Salmon sashimi
Credit: Ivan Samkov via Pexels

Those concerned about environmental impacts may look to eat farmed salmon with certifications from global industry bodies such as the Aquaculture Stewardship Council.

However, even that has problems. Some certifiers have been accused of using underhanded tactics to remain certified, according to the Sustainable Restaurant Association

“In my eyes, you can’t farm Atlantic salmon sustainably,” says Alistair.

For Eva, who has seen the impacts of salmon farming on wild fish, we have the knowledge to improve farming and regulatory changes would help protect the environment. 

“I would say this is on the table of politicians to solve the problems.”

Jackson Ryan
About the author
Jackson Ryan
Jackson Ryan is an award-winning freelance science journalist and President of the Science Journalists Association of Australia. He is co-editor of the 2024 Best Australian Science Writing Anthology, which you should absolutely buy.
View articles
Jackson Ryan is an award-winning freelance science journalist and President of the Science Journalists Association of Australia. He is co-editor of the 2024 Best Australian Science Writing Anthology, which you should absolutely buy.
View articles

NEXT ARTICLE

We've got chemistry, let's take it to the next level!

Get the latest WA science news delivered to your inbox, every fortnight.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Republish

Creative Commons Logo

Republishing our content

We want our stories to be shared and seen by as many people as possible.

Therefore, unless it says otherwise, copyright on the stories on Particle belongs to Scitech and they are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This allows you to republish our articles online or in print for free. You just need to credit us and link to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately.

Using the ‘republish’ button on our website is the easiest way to meet our guidelines.

Guidelines

You cannot edit the article.

When republishing, you have to credit our authors, ideally in the byline. You have to credit Particle with a link back to the original publication on Particle.

If you’re republishing online, you must use our pageview counter, link to us and include links from our story. Our page view counter is a small pixel-ping (invisible to the eye) that allows us to know when our content is republished. It’s a condition of our guidelines that you include our counter. If you use the ‘republish’ then you’ll capture our page counter.

If you’re republishing in print, please email us to let us so we know about it (we get very proud to see our work republished) and you must include the Particle logo next to the credits. Download logo here.

If you wish to republish all our stories, please contact us directly to discuss this opportunity.

Images

Most of the images used on Particle are copyright of the photographer who made them.

It is your responsibility to confirm that you’re licensed to republish images in our articles.

Video

All Particle videos can be accessed through YouTube under the Standard YouTube Licence.

The Standard YouTube licence

  1. This licence is ‘All Rights Reserved’, granting provisions for YouTube to display the content, and YouTube’s visitors to stream the content. This means that the content may be streamed from YouTube but specifically forbids downloading, adaptation, and redistribution, except where otherwise licensed. When uploading your content to YouTube it will automatically use the Standard YouTube licence. You can check this by clicking on Advanced Settings and looking at the dropdown box ‘License and rights ownership’.
  2. When a user is uploading a video he has license options that he can choose from. The first option is “standard YouTube License” which means that you grant the broadcasting rights to YouTube. This essentially means that your video can only be accessed from YouTube for watching purpose and cannot be reproduced or distributed in any other form without your consent.

Contact

For more information about using our content, email us: particle@scitech.org.au

Copy this HTML into your CMS
Press Ctrl+C to copy