READ

The Earth is Rearranging History

The titanic forces of centuries can cause ancient artefacts to move around and confuse our understanding of the past.
Thomas Crow
Thomas Crow
Freelance science writer
The Earth is Rearranging History

Deep below the surface of Murujuga, soil expands and contracts from the passage of water. Each wetting cycle is like a sodden breath from lungs holding fragments of stone and shell.

Stone artefacts from millennia of Aboriginal life are pushed up slowly, maybe only a few millimetres each decade. In one final gasp, they break the surface. 

A thousand-year-old knife lying on the surface, as if dropped yesterday.

For the scientists and Elders trying to preserve the past, this slow grinding over centuries confuses archaeological records.

Murujuga’s moving earth

Upon this rich and red landscape, the Ngarli-Ngarli peoples have carved up to 2 million petroglyphs into the rock faces over the last 50,000 years.

But Professor Matthias Leopold and his colleagues weren’t looking at the petroglyphs – they were searching for buried fragments of Aboriginal life over millennia. 

Alongside the Murujuga Aboriginal Corporation, the scientists wanted to carefully drill into the earth to peel back centuries of layered clay and sand – all to learn the story of life on Middle Gidley Island.

Middle Gidley Island is part of Murujuga, sitting off the coast of the Burrup Peninsula. At the island’s centre is a single, large sediment basin.

Caption: The archaeologists flew to the great sediment basin at Middle Gidley Island to uncover ancient buried tools.
Credit: Mather et al., 2025/Archaeometry

“Think of it like a massive bowl, where different layers of sediment are nicely stacked one over the other,” says Matthias. 

“That’s why we wanted to drill, to find evidence of older environmental layers. We drilled down 10 metres but the core didn’t show the nice layering we were expecting,” he says. 

“That was when we really started thinking about the processes that could influence the distribution of artefacts.”

Clues from the past

Fragments of ancient stone and shell were found exposed across the basin. Each tool fragment discovery was marked with a small square.  

In one square lay stone flakes and shellfish remains, while another held the remains of an axe or grindstone.

Back in the lab, carbon dating revealed that hundreds of these artefacts came from different eras. 

This research helps demonstrate this landscape’s importance, which was added to UNESCO heritage listing in 2025.

Caption: Stone and shell artefacts that spanned different eras of Aboriginal life were already exposed on the island’s surface.
Credit: Mather et al., 2025/Archaeometry

The sediment basin on Middle Gidley Island is a mixture of stone, sand and clay. Each soil type acts differently when wet.

To an archaeologist like Professor Jo McDonald, this was evidence of an old trick that Australia’s claypans like to play on archaeologists.

The hard surfaces of claypans hold the history of how Aboriginal desert peoples used the known nearby water sources.

“We’ve been interested in what makes these amazing concentrations of artefacts,” says Jo. 

“The analysis we have done shows that, in claypans – unlike sand dunes – all the artefacts don’t just sink below the surface. They appear to just sit there on the surface.” 

The earth’s constant shifting confused this record, making it impossible to arrive at relative ages for the found artefacts.

Jo says the team had agreed not to remove any of the stone artefacts as they did analysis on the soil and rock.

Scanning the soil’s secrets

Containers of sand, clay and soil from Murujuga were carefully transported back to Perth for analysis. 

Dr Caroline Mather took 4 kg of island topsoil to her geochemistry lab. The archaeologists created experimental copies of the artefacts from a similar igneous stone.

Over 6 weeks they wet and dried the soil to simulate the island’s seasonal rain events.

It must have been a strange sight at Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, with Caroline and her honours student Kaitlin Sullivan wheeling tubs of soil through the corridors.

“There was a bit of intrigue, that’s for sure,” says Caroline. But they needed a CT scanner to peer through the soil layers.

“You’d go into this room and other people would be dissecting mice. I think they were a bit confused that we were very carefully wheeling in many tubs of soil,” she laughs.

The CT scanner was used to track the buried artefacts moving over weeks. From this, Caroline could calculate how they might move over hundreds or thousands of years.

The scan showed artefacts buried in sand were pulled deeper over time, while the clay would slowly push the tools upwards.

Caption: CT scans peered through the soil to track how water cycles caused stone tools to move over time.
Credit: Mather et al., 2025/Archaeometry

Using Murujuga as a case study, Matthias, Jo and Caroline were able to show how the moving earth can complicate our understanding of Australia’s history.

Imaging, drilling and records show Murujuga’s soil is not a static tomb for the past but a shifting, breathing story where ancient history may rise again.

Thomas Crow
About the author
Thomas Crow
Thomas Crow is an Australian science writer. He has a background in professional writing, biochemistry and genetics. He writes for Australian and New Zealand research institutes and publications like Crikey. He's a horror and gothic fantasy fan. He thinks of himself as a gardener but scores of dead plants beg to differ.
View articles
Thomas Crow is an Australian science writer. He has a background in professional writing, biochemistry and genetics. He writes for Australian and New Zealand research institutes and publications like Crikey. He's a horror and gothic fantasy fan. He thinks of himself as a gardener but scores of dead plants beg to differ.
View articles

NEXT ARTICLE

We've got chemistry, let's take it to the next level!

Get the latest WA science news delivered to your inbox, every fortnight.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Republish

Creative Commons Logo

Republishing our content

We want our stories to be shared and seen by as many people as possible.

Therefore, unless it says otherwise, copyright on the stories on Particle belongs to Scitech and they are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This allows you to republish our articles online or in print for free. You just need to credit us and link to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately.

Using the ‘republish’ button on our website is the easiest way to meet our guidelines.

Guidelines

You cannot edit the article.

When republishing, you have to credit our authors, ideally in the byline. You have to credit Particle with a link back to the original publication on Particle.

If you’re republishing online, you must use our pageview counter, link to us and include links from our story. Our page view counter is a small pixel-ping (invisible to the eye) that allows us to know when our content is republished. It’s a condition of our guidelines that you include our counter. If you use the ‘republish’ then you’ll capture our page counter.

If you’re republishing in print, please email us to let us so we know about it (we get very proud to see our work republished) and you must include the Particle logo next to the credits. Download logo here.

If you wish to republish all our stories, please contact us directly to discuss this opportunity.

Images

Most of the images used on Particle are copyright of the photographer who made them.

It is your responsibility to confirm that you’re licensed to republish images in our articles.

Video

All Particle videos can be accessed through YouTube under the Standard YouTube Licence.

The Standard YouTube licence

  1. This licence is ‘All Rights Reserved’, granting provisions for YouTube to display the content, and YouTube’s visitors to stream the content. This means that the content may be streamed from YouTube but specifically forbids downloading, adaptation, and redistribution, except where otherwise licensed. When uploading your content to YouTube it will automatically use the Standard YouTube licence. You can check this by clicking on Advanced Settings and looking at the dropdown box ‘License and rights ownership’.
  2. When a user is uploading a video he has license options that he can choose from. The first option is “standard YouTube License” which means that you grant the broadcasting rights to YouTube. This essentially means that your video can only be accessed from YouTube for watching purpose and cannot be reproduced or distributed in any other form without your consent.

Contact

For more information about using our content, email us: particle@scitech.org.au

Copy this HTML into your CMS
Press Ctrl+C to copy