Get Regular Updates!
|Untangling the debate on white shark populations


Untangling the debate on white shark populations

Untangling the debate on white shark populations

A white shark population survey by CSIRO has stirred up some political debate, but what do the numbers really tell us?

Untangling the debate on white shark populations

There’s been some hot debate this past week among politicians about sharks.

On one side, they say shark population numbers “make a compelling case” for potentially lethal measures against the animals.

On the other, they’re calling “bullshit”, saying the numbers are stable or declining.

And they’re all referencing the same CSIRO report.

So what’s the truth on this fishy issue?

I spoke to the lead author of the CSIRO paper, Dr Richard Hillary, to find out.

It’s in the family

In case you haven’t heard, the CSIRO paper estimated the numbers of the two white shark populations in Australia: the eastern and the southern western.

“If you draw a line from Wilsons Promontory in Victoria down to Tasmania, everything to the east of there is one population, including New Zealand.”

View Larger
The population estimates for the two white shark populations in Australia: the southern western and eastern

This was no small feat to achieve. Estimating shark population numbers is something that’s proved notoriously difficult in the past.

“Usually what we try and do in more standard fisheries things is try and take how many fish you caught, figure how hard you actually had to work to catch them, and that gives you an idea of how many there are.”

But this method doesn’t work as well with sharks. Caught sharks are rarely recorded, especially since environmental protection methods were put in place. So historically, the records are patchy, which means we’ve never really had a full understanding of how many sharks there were in our waters.

So CSIRO had to get a little creative to come up with a new method. Current genetics are now good enough that we can estimate shark numbers based on how closely related they are.

If there are lots of adult sharks in an area randomly mating, you’d expect the offspring to be quite genetically different and less closely related. Whereas if there’s only a small number of breeding adults, many of their offspring will be full or half brothers and sisters.

“If we focus on half brothers and sisters, now the more adults there are, the less likely you are actually to find them,” says Richard.

“So we use that specific relationship between the chance of you finding a half brother and sister and how many adults there are to turn that around and say, OK, given that we found this many brothers and sisters, how many adults do we actually have?”

But to work that out, you need a DNA sample.

So how exactly do you take a DNA sample from a big, toothy white shark?

“Carefully—if they’re alive!” Richard laughs.

“Because they have a very thick skin, it’s quite difficult. You have to really get a biopsy from into the muscle tissue.”

This is performed by experienced shark researchers, usually while they’re conducting other projects, like acoustic tagging of white sharks.

“A lot of the samples come from animals that have been fitted with an acoustic tag, and the states do a lot of work in this,” says Richard, “so we’re reasonably sure we can get access to continuing numbers of samples.”

CSIRO tagging a juvenile white shark

To cull or not to cull

As you can see in the graphic above, the number of adults in the southern western population is two times higher than the eastern population.

These numbers are what have spurred concerns in the pro-cull camp. Having higher numbers of sharks in the west than the east has some pollies suggesting WA takes more serious protection measures against sharks in the interest of human safety.

But Richard says the evidence just isn’t there yet to make such decisions.

“In terms of issues like protection, we don’t think this work gives any kind of evidence one way or the other,” he says.

“We have to know how many there used to be, and we just don’t know that.”

What this work does do is set the foundation for future population monitoring. Now that we have a good idea how many sharks there are, we can understand a lot better how it changes over the years.

“Now at least we have a basis to evaluate those proposals.”

The golden number of sharks

The debates about sharks seem to be a never-ending tug of war between human safety and ecosystem health.

We know that removing top predators from ecosystems can have devastating consequences, as can a shark taking a bite out of a surfer.

With these two competing interests at heart, how many sharks do we actually want to see in the sea?

“I wish we really knew that!” says Richard.

“There’s still so much we don’t understand, and I know scientists say that a lot, but it’s always true.”

With the competing interests of human safety and ecosystem health, it’s hard to know the ‘golden number’ of sharks
. View Larger
With the competing interests of human safety and ecosystem health, it’s hard to know the ‘golden number’ of sharks
Continuing to research white shark movements, populations and behavior can help us start to work it out
. View Larger
Continuing to research white shark movements, populations and behavior can help us start to work it out

Part of working out how many sharks are ‘too many’ or ‘not enough’ is having a better overall understanding about sharks and how they operate.

For example, a spanner in the works of the cull debate is the fact that high shark populations aren’t always correlated with higher rates of human interaction.

“It sometimes shocks people that the highest densities you’ll probably find for white sharks is in and around Port Stephens in New South Wales,” Richard tells me.

“They’re primarily there for food. But there’s a lot of them there and a lot of people in the water, but you never hear of any interactions.”

“So there’s a lot of things we need to figure out, and that’s been part of the process of developing this very large acoustic tagging dataset.”

Acoustic tagging is helping CSIRO researchers work out where sharks are, where they’re going and what they’re going there for.

They’re also hoping to tease apart the finer details around human-shark interactions.

While CSIRO takes care of the science, you can always help protect yourself by being shark smart or exploring alternative mitigation methods for yourself.

View Larger
Image|Smart Marine Systems
There are non-harmful methods for shark mitigation, like the Clever Buoy system

I just hope we can all cool our jets about shark numbers and leave these fish in the sea—at least until the research has something to say about it.

We love science puns VIDEO


Creative Commons Logo

Republishing our content

We want our stories to be shared and seen by as many people as possible.

Therefore, unless it says otherwise, copyright on the stories on Particle belongs to Scitech and they are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This allows you to republish our articles online or in print for free. You just need to credit us and link to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately.

Using the ‘republish’ button on our website is the easiest way to meet our guidelines.


You cannot edit the article.

When republishing, you have to credit our authors, ideally in the byline. You have to credit Particle with a link back to the original publication on Particle.

If you’re republishing online, you must use our pageview counter, link to us and include links from our story. Our page view counter is a small pixel-ping (invisible to the eye) that allows us to know when our content is republished. It’s a condition of our guidelines that you include our counter. If you use the ‘republish’ then you’ll capture our page counter.

If you’re republishing in print, please email us to let us so we know about it (we get very proud to see our work republished) and you must include the Particle logo next to the credits. Download logo here.

If you wish to republish all our stories, please contact us directly to discuss this opportunity.


Most of the images used on Particle are copyright of the photographer who made them.

It is your responsibility to confirm that you’re licensed to republish images in our articles.


All Particle videos can be accessed through YouTube under the Standard YouTube Licence.

The Standard YouTube licence

  1. This licence is ‘All Rights Reserved’, granting provisions for YouTube to display the content, and YouTube’s visitors to stream the content. This means that the content may be streamed from YouTube but specifically forbids downloading, adaptation, and redistribution, except where otherwise licensed. When uploading your content to YouTube it will automatically use the Standard YouTube licence. You can check this by clicking on Advanced Settings and looking at the dropdown box ‘License and rights ownership’.
  2. When a user is uploading a video he has license options that he can choose from. The first option is “standard YouTube License” which means that you grant the broadcasting rights to YouTube. This essentially means that your video can only be accessed from YouTube for watching purpose and cannot be reproduced or distributed in any other form without your consent.


For more information about using our content, email us:

Copy this HTML into your CMS
Press Ctrl+C to copy

We've got chemistry. Want something physical?